
Don’t forget to email your MP. Why not email them a picture of the poster in your window!
DPAC Cymru social media:
https://linktr.ee/swanseaDPAC

DPAC Cymru social media:

Contributions welcome! Please send it in to swaneadpac@gmail.com and/or dpaccardiffandvalleys@gmail.com
Follow each link for instructions and template letters.

Below is an extract of a letter from Steve Witherden MP, which was co-signed and enthusiastically supported by unanimous democratic votes of Swansea and Cardiff & Valleys Disabled People Against Cuts groups, calling for the disability benefit cuts to be abandoned, and for disabled people to be involved in the reform of the welfare system.
Dear Secretary of State,
Impacts of the Pathways to Work Green Paper on Wales
The Pathways to Work Green Paper poses a significant threat to over 275,000 Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and 110,000 Universal Credit (UC) recipients in Wales.
The proposals to tighten PIP eligibility and cut the UC health element will push thousands deeper into poverty. Wales will be hit particularly hard.
Policy in Practise’s latest report, The impact of disability benefit reforms in Wales, sees household incomes of an individual in Wales receiving both PIP and the UC Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity element cut by 68% as a result of these reforms.
The knock-on effects will place additional strain on the public sector, including local authorities, health boards, and charitable organisations. The Welsh economy is consequently set to lose an estimated £470 million annually.
We therefore urge you to:
1. Abandon current plans to withdraw disability-related benefits.
2. Meaningfully involve disabled people in the design and delivery of any future reforms.
3. Provide transparency on how these changes will affect Wales and interact with devolved responsibilities.
4. Reform the system to support, not hinder, disabled people and those with long-term health conditions.
The UK Government must safeguard the welfare state for those who need it most.
Without meaningful reform, these proposals will deepen hardship and entrench inequality in Wales.
Yours sincerely,
Steve Witherden MP
Disability Rights UK
Disability Wales
Coalition Against Benefit Cuts
Carers Wales
All Wales People First
Torfaen Access Forum
Disability Arts Cymru
Swansea DPAC
Cardiff & Valleys DPAC
Headway – the brain injury association

Cymraeg (Welsh) : Protest tu allan ymgynghoriad toriadau anabledd Caerdydd
The DWP have rescheduled their consultation on the disability cuts. The venue is now much more accessible and has better transport links.
This was the result of disabled voices calling out the injustices of the previous event.
The consultation is still unfair with the most controversial proposals not up for discussion.
Outside Ty William Morgan, 6 Central Square, Cardiff, CF10 1EP
12:45 – 16:00 *
Monday the 23rd of June
* Please do not feel you have to stay for the full time.
It’s important that those wanting to attend the consultation are not prevented from doing so.
Mae’r DWP wedi aildrefnu eu hymgynghoriad ar y toriadau anabledd. Mae’r lleoliad newydd yn llawer haws i’w gyrraedd ac efo cysylltiadau trafnidiaeth gwell.
Mae hyn oherwydd bod pobl anabl wedi galw allan anhegwch y digwyddiad.
Mae’r ymgynghoriad dal yn anheg gan fod yr awgrymiadau mwyaf dadleuol dal ddim yn cael eu trafod
Gwybodaeth protest
Tu allan Tŷ William Morgan, 6 Sgwâr Canolog, Caerdydd, CF10 1EP
12:45 – 16:00
Dydd Llun Mehefin 23
Plȋs peidiwch a teimlo eich bod yn gorfod aros am yr amser i gyd.
Mae’n bwysig bod y rhai sydd eisiau mynychu’r ymgynghoriad ddim yn cael eu stopio rhag gwneud hynny.
Mae’r llywodraeth eisiau cymryd arian a help o bobl anabl.
Mae pobl anabl yn poeni ac yn flin.
Mae’r llywodraeth yn cael cyfarfod efo ni yng Nghymru.
Does dim llawer o bobl yn cael mynd i’r cyfarfod.
Mae’r cyfarfod yn anheg.
‘Da ni eisiau pobl i brotestio tu allan i’r cyfarfod
Bydd protest yn rhoi gobaith i ni.
Mae’r brotest ar ddydd Llun 23 Mehefin 2025 yng Nghaerdydd.
Mae’r brotest yn dechrau am 12:45 ac yn gorffen am 4yp. ‘Da chi ddim yn gorfod aros am yr holl amser. Gallwch ymuno ar unrhyw adeg.
Bydd y brotest tu allan Tŷ William Morgan, 6 Sgwâr Canolog, Caerdydd, CF10 1EP
Social media:

️ Tuesday 1st of July, 4pm [Previously 3rd July]
at the front of Lime Street Station L3 5QB
They are not even waiting for the sham “consultation” to end on 30th of June.
More details to follow but it is essential that as many people as possible attend these events.
Some funding is available for travel and other essential costs. Email mail@dpac.uk.net

Dear Stephen Timms,I am writing to you on behalf of Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) to urgently raise concerns regarding the accessibility of the consultation on the benefits cuts proposed in the March 2025 Green Paper. In light of the limited time available for the consultation which is due to close on 30 June 2025, you are asked to take urgent action to address our concerns, confirm what steps are being taken and to extend the time available for disabled people to engage with the consultation given the accessibility issues they have faced to date. In order for the consultation to fulfil its purpose. Disabled people who are likely to be affected by proposed benefits changes, must have a proper and meaningful opportunity to engage with the consultation and accessible arrangements must therefore be urgently made to facilitate their proper participation in the consultation.
Our concerns
The face-to-face consultation in Cardiff on the 3rd June was cancelled less than two days after the venue was announced, with only one working day left before the event.
The DWP has claimed that the Cardiff venue cancelled the meeting at the last minute yet the venue itself was already inaccessible to disabled people. No transport to the venue was offered by the DWP for those who wanted to take part.
The booked venue was only revealed at the last minute. This was despite disabled people asking multiple times, over weeks, for information so that they could plan journeys, accommodation, and access requirements. The venue was far out of the centre of Cardiff, and completely inaccessible for many disabled people, especially at such short notice. It would have meant a wheelchair user travelling 1.6 miles unassisted. Shockingly this was the only face-to-face consultation event for the whole of Wales.
People at other DWP consultations in England have had similarly poor experiences. For example, lack of accessibility of the venue led to only 9 out of 15 people managing to attend the in-person consultation event in the South West.
The in-person consultations did not cover the North of England – Carlisle and Newcastle were completely missed out. For Wales, the North and South are poorly connected so any meaningful consultation would require not just an event in the South but another in the North.
In Northern Ireland no face-to-face consultations appear to be taking place at all and the date of the online consultation was only announced last week.
We have also received concerning feedback about the online consultations and the understanding of those conducting the meeting. One attendee reported:
It was also clear that not all participants fully understood the consultation questions or their implications, particularly those without background knowledge of the benefits system. This raises significant concerns about the quality and reliability of the feedback being gathered. At one point, the facilitator was unable to explain New Style ESA or JSA, and I had to step in to clarify how these benefits work, especially for those who do not qualify for income-related support. It was concerning to witness such a knowledge gap from someone facilitating a consultation on welfare reform.
Although we were told that all feedback would be recorded — even on topics not officially included in the consultation — it is unclear how that information will be used or whether it will influence policy development in any meaningful way.
The impact of the failure to make arrangements for accessible and meaningful consultation meetings
Only having online consultations and/or not having sufficient and/or accessible face-to-face consultations is unacceptable because, as I’m sure you’re aware, at least one-third of disabled people do not have access to the internet or the skills needed to take part in an online meeting. This obviously means that many people who will be most affected by the Government’s planned cuts to social security payments will be totally excluded from taking part in any consultation events.
We are concerned that the consultation not only doesn’t deal with many of the policies that are most likely to affect disabled people (as it only deals with 12 out of 22 policies) but fails to properly engage disabled people on those limited topics. We are also concerned that full impact assessments which would inform engagement with the consultation are not available and will not be made available during the course of the consultation.
The whole process to date seems inaccessible, chaotic and incomplete and given how few people are being consulted, both virtually and in person, we are extremely concerned about how representative this process is and whether it meets even the most basic standards of engagement with disabled people and their advocates.
Furthermore it is DPAC’s view that the whole process is flawed and is non-compliant with Articles 4 (3) and 33.3 of the UN CRPD and General Comment 7. It also violates the Gunning Principles and the requirements to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act and is therefore potentially unlawful. The only meaningful remedy is to withdraw the proposals and meaningfully engage with disabled people and our representative organisations to ensure all government proposals are compliant with the UN CRPD and equality legislation and ensure progressive realisation of the articles as well as compliance with equality duties. Failure to address these flaws may result in legal action and sanction from the disability committee of the UN.
It is essential that the government start again on welfare reform, listening to disabled people and carers in a genuine process of co-production.
In light of the concerns outlined above and the limited time available, we invite you within 7 days i.e. by June 16th to confirm:
1. What steps are being taken to ensure that online and in-person consultation events are accessible and available to affected disabled people across all relevant regions. This should include ensuring accessible venues, across a range of regions as well as adequate notice to allow for attendance arrangements to be made.;
2. That the time for engagement with the consultation will be extended by at least 4 weeks, to reflect the delays in making accessible arrangements and allow meaningful engagement with disabled people.
We look forward to your response by June 16th.
Linda Burnip
On behalf of the DPAC steering group
c.c. Debbie Abrahams, Chair of the Work and Pensions Select Committee,
Katie Farrington, Director General Social Security, Disability and Pensions
Helga Swindenbank, Head of Disability Services

The DWP have cancelled the only in-person consultation event on the disability cuts for the whole of Wales, and do not plan to run another.
They did this after announcing an inaccessible venue at the last minute, in what we believe to be a clear example of disability discrimination.
The consultation was always going to be unfair, given half the proposals – the most important half – were off the table for discussion on day one.
We are demanding that there must be no vote in the House of Commons on disability cuts until a full and genuine public consultation has been carried out in Wales.
Please sign our open letter, and ask your MP or Member of the Senedd (Welsh Parliament) to sign too. You can sign, and ask your MP to sign, even if you don’t live in Wales.
Below is a template letter for contacting your MP or MS.
Find your MP or MS using WriteToThem, Find your MP, and/or Find a Member of the Senedd (in Wales)
[Please use this template as a starting point and use your own words as much as possible.]
Dear [MP or member of the Senedd]
I am writing as your constituent to ask that you support an open letter demanding that there must be no disability benefit cuts vote in the House of Commons until Wales has had a full and genuine consultation – #NoVoteWithoutWales
The DWP have now cancelled the only in-person consultation event on the disability cuts for the whole of Wales, and have communicated that they do not plan to run another. Instead they are suggesting an online-only event at the end of the month, probably after any vote has already happened. This isn’t good enough.
The DWP cancelled the consultation after announcing an inaccessible venue at the last minute, in what could only be described as a clear example of disability discrimination.
Given the DWP’s failures, any consultation must now be run independently by Welsh disabled people’s organisations.
Please read and sign here:
https://Bit.Ly/No-Vote-Without-Wales
Kind regards,
[Name]
[Postcode]
[Phone number]

The only face-to-face consultation for the whole of Wales has now been cancelled, after blatant and unlawful disability discrimination by the DWP in arranging such an inaccessible venue at the last minute.
The Cardiff disability cuts consultation on the 3rd was always going to be unfair, with half the proposals, the most important half, completely off the table for discussion.
According to DWP email communications, there will now not be any in-person consultation on the disability cuts in Wales.
We demand that any house of commons vote on the proposals must not go ahead until we have had a full and genuine public consultation in Wales.
The DWP are now only offering an online-only event at the end of June. This is not acceptable. It is possible that MPs will already have voted by then.
DPAC are sticking with our existing plans to protest.
Meet us outside the front of Cardiff Central train station at noon on the 3rd.
The DWP have shown themselves to be incapable of organising a fair consultation. Disabled People Against Cuts will hold our own.
Fortunately, we no longer have to worry about transport to an inaccessible location, and we will hold our protest at our original meeting point.
We invite everyone to join us and have their say. We demand that the DWP turn up and listen.
Updated plans for the day are available on our LinkTree: LinkTr.ee/SwanseaDPAC
The Swansea West MP, Torsten Bell, a DWP minister, who defends the cuts, has insulted us and has refused to debate with us. His excuse was that a public consultation is taking place. Now that there is no public consultation taking place for the whole of Wales, Torsten must stop dodging and finally accept our invitation to debate his policies with Swansea Disabled People Against Cuts. We have written to him once again to ask for a fair and respectful public debate.
Dear Torsten Bell MP,
As you are aware, Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) members in Swansea have repeatedly invited you to publicly debate with us on the issue of disability benefit cuts, which you have defended on Newsnight.
The only face-to-face consultation for the whole of Wales has now been cancelled, after blatant and unlawful disability discrimination by the DWP in arranging such an inaccessible venue at the last minute.
At 6pm on Friday 25 April, responding to our request for a debate, and after press attention over your lack of reply, you told us that you “have to politely decline given the Department is carrying out a public consultation with public events on this issue.”
Given your stated reason for declining, and given (according to the DWP) that there will now be no Wales in-person consultation, Swansea DPAC expect you to now “politely accept” our invitation, as supported in an open letter signed by more than 250 individuals and organisations, including a national Labour-affiliated trade union. (bit.ly/swansea-dpac-debate-
invite) We would ensure that the debate is carried out fairly, respectfully, and in an orderly fashion. Please let us know when you are available and we will book a venue.
We also seek a public retraction and apology for your repeated public accusations of dishonesty against Swansea Disabled People Against Cuts. We robustly defend claims we have made about your language and refusal to engage with us as asked. Given your accusations, we are putting this letter on the record, copying to journalists, and we will publish any reply, so that the public can judge.
Kind regards,
Swansea Disabled People Against Cuts
The proposals are fatally flawed, and the “pathways to work” green paper must be retracted.
The government must start again on welfare reform, listening to disabled people and carers in a genuine process of co-production. It cannot be an excuse for short-term budget cuts.
Above: Swansea Disabled People Against Cuts protesting
Notes:
Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) Cymru is a group of disabled people from across Wales. It is made up of Swansea DPAC, Cardiff and Valleys DPAC, and individual members in West, North, and Mid Wales. We are affiliated to Disabled People Against Cuts nationally.
Disabled People Against Cuts Cymru are releasing a full press statement on Monday morning. Press queries can be sent to swanseadpac@gmail.com
We also invite anyone interested in coming to our fortnightly meetings, or receiving our meeting minutes and email updates, to please get in touch.

Leeds, Marriot Hotel Wednesday May 21st
6 Leeds DPAC members made their way to the Marriot Hotel to protest against the Labour Government and DWP Pathways to Work Consultation, that has now received the nation-wide moniker of Consulta-sham. One of our member was (un)lucky enough to have been given a ticket to enter the sham and the other 5 of us, made our way to the hotel steps to unfurl our banner and begin our chants. We were met by the DWP lead organiser of the event and 2 security guards who informed us we were on Hotel property and that we would have to stand in front of the steps. The DWP spokesperson tried to be polite whilst we asked why a paltry 20 people had been offered tickets to get in. He said rather confusing that if there was spare space he’d come and invite us in – this never happened although only 15 people turned up for the con-sulta-sham.
We began our chants, “welfare, not warfare, you say cut-backs, we say fight-back!” Trevelyan Square is a busy square so plenty of people were witness to our protest. We gave out flyers about the Green Paper and explained it’s likely effects on our community. People in general were very supportive.
We had the pleasure of being joined by activists in Unite the Union and Crips Against Cuts, who raised the volume and energy. A heartfelt thanks to them!
Our comrade inside the meeting stated:
“There were as many DWP staff as consultees in the meeting – clearly not a question of space then. We asked if our comrades could come in as there was spare space but were told that the hotel ‘security’ had blocked the entry of anyone else! The hotel said it contravened their risk assessment. We were asked pre-scripted questions. We were told that we couldn’t comment on proposed changed to the PIP scoring system despite this being the most impactful proposed change. I pointed out it was misleading to call this event ‘Pathways to Work’ given that PIP isn’t an out of work benefit. We explained that DLA and PIP are not lilke4-like so moving 16-18 years olds to PIP may lose their entitlement. I expressed concern about this group were supposed to do without life-supporting benefits, especially those no loner able to live at home or leaving care. The questions were ostensibly focused on getting people into work but I pointed out that without addressing Access to Work or any commitment from employers to step-up their reasonable adjustments the support is not fit for purpose. I stressed that DWP work coaches aren’t knowledgeable enough to understand the range of health conditions they are charged with assessing.”
Ultimately, we all felt this consultation was not fit for purpose. Only asking pre-selected questions about the less impactful changes and only consulting a tiny minority of those affected renders the process toothless. Solidarity to those fighting these poorly thought out proposals
More info: https://www.facebook.com/events/4069198743403992/

#WelfareNotWarfare
Call protests now over the parliamentary recess 8-22 April.
While lavishing money on the military the Labour government is continuing to pursue its attack on support for Deaf and disabled people announced in Rachel Reeves’ Spring statement.
We are calling for DPAC groups and supporters to call local protests across the country to demand the damaging cuts to social security for Deaf and Disabled people are stopped.
We want MPs to commit now to vote against these cuts which will drive people into poverty.
Local protests are a chance to reach Deaf and Disabled people who are worried about the cuts and isolated – we need to turn fear into anger and action.
We can raise awareness of the true scale and impact of these vicious cuts and build the solidarity in our communities needed to defeat them.
What we are calling for:
Local protests over parliamentary recess 8-22 April 2025.
Where possible target MPs strategically. See our list here: https://dpac.uk.net/2025/04/mps-who-support-disability-benefit-cuts/
Many MPs no longer operate public offices or surgeries – where this is the case could you protest at local Constituency Labour Party meetings, Town Halls or local events where MPs will be attending. Even if the MP isn’t in attendance it makes the point but please do be aware that we want Labour Party members onside so we are protesting the position their MP has taken and not protesting against them.
As always, we encourage the use of creativity to make protests inclusive and attention grabbing.
Make sure there are options for people to take part and be involved even if they can’t attend in person. National DPAC is about to produce this online engagement toolkit but local groups should look to produce your own options for members.
If you are protesting outside an MP’s office please follow these guidelines: https://dpac.uk.net/2025/04/guidelines-for-protesting-specific-mps/. We want to make our point but do not prevent people who need to see their MP for help with benefits appeals, asylum applications or other urgent needs from doing so.
Where May Day rallies, Stop the War and We Demand Change events are being organised in your area reach out now to organisers to request someone from your DPAC group can speak to raise the fight against benefit cuts – an attack on the whole working class.
If you have an MP who has come out against the cuts do something to positively acknowledge this – letters to the local press on why they are right to reject the cuts can help our message reach a wider audience. You can find a list here: https://labourlist.org/2025/04/spring-statement-welfare-reforms-liz-kendall-rachel-reeves-labour-rebels/
And keep up the letter writing and most importantly every DPAC member should try to arrange a face to face meeting with your MP. These do make a difference even if the MP doesn’t appear to be listening and/or just trots out the party line. Make them give up their time for you. Make them see how many people this matters to and how it will impact their majorities if they follow Starmer, Reeves and Kendall in their performative cruelty.
Resources
Norfolk DPAC has created a resource deposit with template materials that local groups can share and use. Link coming soon!

Disability News Service (DNS) has been investigating claims of dishonesty in the personal independence payment (PIP) assessment process for the last 18 months.
Now a leading discrimination lawyer has said he may be able to take legal cases on behalf of PIP claimants who believe that the healthcare professionals who carried out their face-to-face assessments did not honestly report the results of those assessments.
The cases would be taken under the Equality Act, but crucially the assessment must have happened in the last six months, for legal reasons.
If there are any PIP claimants who have had an assessment in the last few months and want to consider legal action, please contact DNS – with some brief details of the dishonesty and when it took place – either by phone or email.
If you’re interested in potentially taking a legal case, contact DNS editor John Pring by phone (weekdays only, please: 01635 228907) or email: john@disabilitynewsservice.com
Read the background here https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/comment-seeking-claimants-to-take-legal-cases-over-pip-dishonesty/

Summary
No one will lose what they’ve already been awarded.
No one will have to have a face to face assessment – the 1.6 million claims being reviewed.
Your money if you’re entitled to more following the court case and new rules will be backdated if you would qualify under the new rules.
full details in Hansard link

Different forms of Government Propaganda began and ended the year. We saw delays, backlogs, more cuts, more campaigns and direct actions. We reproduce some of the DPAC actions, research and call outs from 2014. Highlights included the Westminster Abbey Occupation against the closure of ILF as part of the #saveilf campaign, lowlights included the court case that arrived at the decision that Penning had taken appropriate process into account by saying that ILF users could be entitled to less under local authorities. Chaos with the DWP, PIP, ESA was compounded by misinformation, dodgy stats , backlogs and increasing sanctions. The brilliant Hammersmith and Fulham Coalition against Cuts achieved the abolition of ‘care’ charges by their local authority-proving it can be done. Esther McVey was awarded Scrooge of the year. DPAC was threatened with legal action for our support of the Anthony Kletzander campaign -in response we increased the campaign, and the relationship in the propaganda against disabled people between the DWP and the Mail was finally exposed
News that the UNCRPD Committee had initiated its first ever inquiry into grave and systematic violations of the UN Convention against the UK identified how far our disability rights and independent living had been eroded by the Coalition-although the Mail didnt seem to like it much
Our constant court cases against the DWP continued, and we have more lined up for this year too- yes, we could be talking to you Motability!
We look forward to 2015 and a change in the regime that has seen the poor grow poorer, while the richest grew richer. A year in which we launch Who2vote4? and the DPAC revenge tour. We will continue to fight for #saveilf with an event on 6th Jan at the House of Commons and an online twitter event.
For an excellent review of the fight against cuts from 2010-2014 please download From Cuts to Resistance and if you want a count down to the election , then the DPAC downloadable calender can help
Here’s to a better year in 2015 with thanks to all our members and supporters. Keep up with news in 2015 by subscribing to posts through our website www.dpac.uk.net or follow us on twitter @Dis_ppl_protest
Some selected actions of DPAC in 2014
January saw the posting of a call for those who were waiting for PIP due to backlogs. This post has received over 40,000 views,shares and many comments. The situation has now been described as a backlog that , at the current rate , could take 42 years to clear. For those claiming ‘reforms’ are working have a look to see that they are not: https://dpac.uk.net/2014/01/have-you-waited-months-for-a-pip-assessment/ and let’s not forget the backlog in ESA either-in short complete chaos for disabled people.
In ‘Austerity Street: the real impacts’ we reproduced some of the stories we had received from those left without cash and homes via sanctions, delays and backlogs. This was in response to Love Production’s poverty porn , Benefits Street, part of the media’s continued demonization regime -the campaign incorporated a twitter fest against the format of biased programming. We supported our partners in Canada Sudbury Coalition Against Poverty (SCAP) and Ontario Coalition Aginst Poverty (OCAP). In an international campaign against increasing homelessness. Austerity is global. We supported Boycott workfare against CAPITA cashing in on poverty.
Through the excellent work of Nick Dilworth we exposed more BBC media double dealing and the fact that they weren’t publicizing the 88% success rates of those claiming ESA and asked ‘Are the DWP failing apart at every level? When a freedom of information response incorrectly claimed that PIP was subjected to sanctions. In another they claimed that the cap would be cut for those without children, both were incorrect. With Inclusion London we campaigned against the Care Act’s exclusion of ‘independent living’ and DPAC also joined Hands off London Transport against ticket office closures, as well as regional Rail protests
February We joined the many direct actions against the removal of legal aid. Raquel Rolnik ‘s report on the bedroom tax is published and recommends immediate suspension of the bedroom tax. The Government’s response is to accuse her of giving sacrifices to Marx and telling her to ‘sort out her own country’. We republish the excellent ‘Why the rise of UKIP is dangerous for disabled people’ and receive the usual abuse from Kippers proving the point. DPAC, Black Triangle and Wow publish a joint statement on Atos exit strategy , calling again for an end to the WCA. We expose how 9 out of 10 sanctions are dismissed when challenged
March More direct actions against proposed cuts in legal aid for judicial review.We publish ‘Punching Holes in Austerity’ an insightful analysis of DPAC and direct actions. DPAC supports #stopchanges2A2W against punitive changes in Access to Work. We publish an update on Anthony Kletzander and questions for HSE in Ireland with ENIL , a story of human rights abuse in Dublin, Ireland, a stand that we would later find invoked a threat of legal action against one of our co-founders.
DPAC joins protests against DWP and ATOS country wide. Protests that were reminiscent of the very first DPAC protests against Atos carried out by DPAC from 2011 onwards, culminating in the 2012 DPAC Atos games that saw Atos tarnished forever. DPAC leads direct actions and online protests against the despised disability Con-fident, leading to the highest number of tweets and retweets ever, exposing the scheme as no more than a Government gloss while they were cutting access to work and removing the means for disabled people to work. We produce a critical analysis of Pennings impact assessment regarding ILF. We reproduce the piece by John Pring asking ‘Where was your MP during the Wow Debate’
April The brilliant Ellen Clifford travels to Canada to embark on a successful speaking tour with raise the rates. We hold a well attended DPAC Grassroots Fightback conference. DPAC, Inclusion London, Equal Lives and the Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People promote the #saveilf postcard campaign. Top Corrie stars support the postcard campaign to #saveilf. DPAC supports Lifeworks and protests against cuts to mental health support. DPAC gives its response to Labour on reform of WCA
May DPAC releases its research documents for download. DPAC and ILF users block the DWP in protest. We learn that disabled students allowances are now under threat of cuts. DPAC publishes a powerful piece by one of our readers that sums up many peoples’ feelings: ‘I’ll never forgive or forget what this Government has done to me and thousands of others‘. We pay homage to the strength of Quiet Riot, celebrate the #dpactour and the success of the Freedom Riders.
June The Independent Living Fund’s Birthday protest happens in June with lots of action outside the DWP. We see JSA benefit sanctions sky rocket under the coalition Government. More actions happen to fight the bedroom tax.
We publish a piece by Angela 28 on how ‘care’ support has been threatened and why that threatens independent living and rights– legal representation was found for many people, but we were aware that this was happening to many more people through emails to dpac mail. Unlike some organisations we attempt to challenge these instances and reject the rhetoric that there is more ‘choice and control’ for disabled people.
At the end of June DPAC with UKUNCUT, and Occupy carry out a daring occupation of Westminster Abbey , after months of planning to highlight the #saveilf campaign. There were 3 police to every protester , and while we had no support from the dear old church , messages of support and publicity poured in
July We publish a joint statement in response to the Work and Pensions Committee on the WCA from DPAC, Black Triangle, the Mental Health Resistance Network, Pats petition, Wow and New Approach in which we again say the WCA should be scrapped.
An ILF user makes a plea to Disability Rights UK (DRUK) on ILF after he was denied the right to speak at their independent living conference. DRUK did not feel the need to offer any response. In Disability Rights UK : independent Living or new visions in Neo-Liberalism we ask why the DRUK ‘independent living ‘ conference was sponsored by an organisation running institutions, segregated schooling and ‘hospitals for those with mental health issues. We also launched a highly successful twitter campaign asking the same questions, again DRUK did not feel they owed disabled people any response to this outrage.
DPAC highlights more chaos at the DWP on appeals and sanctions. John McDonnell launches an Early Day Motion to #saveilf. Positive updates and actions on the WCA court case regarding mental health claimants by the Mental Health Resistance Network. We ask that people write to IDS to raise issues happening regarding mental health.
August Rethink calls people with mental health issues a ‘disease burden’ Mental Health Resistance Network respond to the outrage. We call for a stop to discrimination for those transferring from DLA to PIP who do not get backdated payments. DPAC continues to support anti-fracking protests with Reclaim the power.
We republish the excellent Nick Dilworth’s piece on how the media are ignoring what’s happening to disabled people https://dpac.uk.net/2014/08/a-national-scandal-4-million-people-face-chaos-in-this-country-and-are-ignored-by-the-media/
ILF user John Kelly speaks to BBC on the impacts of the potential loss of ILF. We ask what happens when ILF funds are not ring fenced to local authorities
September sees a national day of Protest against sanctions, bedroom tax and benefit caps.
The fantastic Brian Hilton produces a set of pics for party conference season on #saveilf. DPAC crash the Tory Party Conference via a successful tweet attack and in person. We do the same to Labour.
We publish The Great Farago: UKIP sleight of hand and receive more abuse from Kippers, Richard Howitt Labour MEP quotes the piece and receives even more abuse.
New short film launched with the Daily Mirror on ILF.
The first inkling that the DWP are wrongly asking those in the ESA support group to attend work focused interviews comes to our notice.
DPAC is threatened with legal action for supporting Anthony Kletzander and publicising the abuse of his human rights in Ireland, our response is to publish an interview with Anthony’s parents on the injustice Anthony and his family have endured.
October We reblog the excellent Johnny Void piece on the boss of Maximus https://dpac.uk.net/2014/10/meet-richard-a-montoni-the-five-million-dollar-maximus-boss-here-to-fleece-the-uks-benefits-system/.
We publish an open letter to Freud who declared that disabled people can work for less than minimum wage. DPAC and Occupy pay another visit to the DWP Caxton House building for ‘Freud must go!’ protest
In Secrets and Lies :maximus the new leader of the inhumans we ask why Disability Rights UK have agreed to a) be part of the Maximus testing process on the WCA and b) why they’ve teamed up with Unum and other insurance companies to develop a TV program showing how much better off disabled people will be if they take out private insurance- with user-led disability organisations like these we dont need enemies.
ILF users return to court to challenge the DWP on ILF. A successful #saveilf vigil happens with road blocks, many messages of support and some great pics.
Welfare assistance fund is next under threat of closure. Campaign to save it is launched.
November The Final Litchfield Review shows that the WCA should be scrapped.
One of our favourite reports of the year : IDS is chased around a building to drown out shouts of murderer at Ipswich- congratulations to the local dpac group for that one!
We ask people to come forward to launch a legal challenge on cuts to the disabled student allowance
£86 million goes missing from Pudsley’s children in need account BBC to blame for mislaying -complainants are actually advised to write to Pudsley via his BBC email
DWP increase attacks on disabled benefit recipients with claims they can harress them off benefits. We put out an urgent call-out https://dpac.uk.net/2014/11/urgent-people-awaiting-wca-assessments-particularly-in-birmingham-please-read/
Work Providers A4E are exposed again in relation to ESA and workfare. The Rev Paul Nicolson wins in court against council tax. Class War’s continuing protests against ‘poor doors’ get to the authorities who make arrests- and Boris is burnt. Meanwhile DPAC discovers Motability’s sneaky backdoor changes to individuals needing to be in work to qualify for support https://dpac.uk.net/2014/11/motability-and-the-deserving-and-undeserving-charity-not-rights/
December ILF users lose court case on ILF but its not over.
DPAC launches an Open letter to Ed, Kate and Rachel on ILF– we’re still waiting for a response
Hammersmith and Fulham abolish home ‘care’ charges, showing it can be done. Congratulations for a great campaign to the excellent Kevin Caulfield and Debbie Domb and all at Hammersmith and Fulham Coalition against Cuts
Esther McVey is named scrooge of the year, which we though was a little too kind to the creature
Unsurprisingly the Work and Pensions report slammed the Government ‘mismanagament of Access to Work – the stop the changes to Access to Work campaign continues.
Questions are asked on the Government costs in fighting against disabled peoples’equality
The link between the DWP and the Mail propaganda is finally nailed and exposed as the DWP is caught out https://dpac.uk.net/2014/12/dwp-caught-giving-disability-propaganda-to-daily-mail/

A very interesting piece of information has come to light, which shows that Capita, which relies in part on contracted staff to deliver the PIP contract, has doubled the incentives offered to their staff, supposedly in order to clear the backlog which has accumulated since the introduction of PIP. As can be seen in the document below, a contracted HP can earn up to £6,300 a month for 21 assessments, after the report is completed. The target does not seem to be stretching it, as it represents 1 assessment per working day. Even if paying this whopping sum, Capita is still bound a make a profit.
see: www.trainedtodo.co.uk/Home
New Incentive Payment Scheme
To further incentivise performance we have recently launched a NEW performance incentive scheme that runs from 1st August 2014 to 30th September 2014. The rate for completed and closed reports will be doubled for this period.
*New Incentivised Pay Rate for DWP Approved & Unapproved Contract Disability Assessors
Incentive Period 1st Aug 2014 to 30th Sept 2014
1 – 8 assessments £160 per report
(£80 from 1st Oct 14)
9 – 14 assessments £200 per report
(£100 from 1st Oct 14)
15 – 20 assessments £240 per report
(£120 from 1st Oct 14)
21 assessments + £300 per report
(£150 from 1st Oct 14)
* For DWP ‘Approved’ Disability Assessors
Approved is defined as achieving 4 consecutive Grade A reports following training.
Help where it really matters
Our overriding objective when carrying out each and every PIP assessment is to ensure an informed, fair and equitable decision is reached for the claimant and the DWP. Find out more
Latest jobs
We are currently recruiting Disability Assessors and Clinical Trainers for all areas across Central England and Wales
CONTRACT ROLES: New Incentive Period Pay Rate!
*£160 – £300 per completed and closed report
New Incentive Period 1st Aug 2014 to 30th Sept 2014
Reverting to £80 – £150 per quality completed report from 1st Oct to 30th Nov 2014
PERMANENT ROLES: New Incentive Payment
£300 for each case completed and closed above the monthly volume target. Incentive period is from 1st Aug 2014 to 30th Sept 2014
Reverting to £150 from 1st Oct 2014 to 30th Nov 2014
Salary: £32k plus 23 days holiday, contributory pension scheme and flexible benefits.

| Potential legal challenge to PIP delays.Anyone who has/is experiencing delays with regard to their PIP application might be able to mount a legal challenge. If you are in this situation and would be willing to speak to a solicitor with regard to making a legal challenge please email us at mail@dpac.uk.netBBC South Today programmeBBC South Today, regional TV News for Hampshire, Dorset, West Sussex and a bit of Surrey still need to find people willing to appear on TV about PIP. They’re looking into what impact the change to Personal Independent Payments has had on people with disabilities in the South They need a case study for someone who has unsuccessfully applied for PiP – or has had severe delays with their application. Maybe it’s had a financial impact or just been more stressful than the old system. Anyone able to help should contact you could contact Katy Austin on 02380 374540, 07732 986357 or email katy.austin2@bbc.co.uk. |

I am a journalist with BBC Radio Wales. I’m currently researching a half-hour programme looking at people’s experience of the process of applying for PIP for broadcast towards the end of October.
I’m particularly keen to hear from people who have found delays in the assessment and decision-making processes who would be prepared to share their experiences through a pre-recorded radio interview over the next month or so.
I hope that you are able to help. Please get back to me if you need any more information.
Regards,
Andy Fry
Series Producer, “Eye on Wales”, BBC Radio Wales
Work/Gwaith: 029 2032 2406 or 029 2032 3763
* Room E1102, Broadcasting House, Llandaff, Cardiff CF5 2YQ
* Ystafell E1102, Y Ganolfan Ddarlledu, Llandaf, Caerdydd CF5 2YQ

Katy a journalist from BBC South Today, regional TV News for Hampshire, Dorset, West Sussex and a bit of Surrey is looking into what impact the change to Personal Independent Payments has had on disabled people in the South – She is currently finding out how many people who’ve applied for PiP since it was rolled out have been successful and would like to hear from anyone who has unsuccessfully applied for PiP – or has had severe delays with their application. She’s interested to kow how this has affected you whether it’s had a financial impact or just been more stressful than the old system.
If you are willing to talk to Katy she’ d be grateful if you could contact her on 02380 374540, 07732 986357 or email katy.austin2@bbc.co.uk.

Responsible department: Department for Work and Pensions
We are asking for the inequality in the way Personal Independent Payment (PIP) claims are handled to be stopped and for those making transfers from Disability Living Allowance (DLA) to PIP to be treated in the same way as fresh claims for PIP.
Currently those making claims for PIP have their payments backdated to date of claim. However those receiving DLA do not get their claim backdated even if a change of circumstance means they are entitled to a higher rate of payment.
Payments are made from date of decision, meaning current delays, which the DWP admit to, mean claimants losing out on several weeks payments, depending on the length of delay and time to process a claim.
This goes against what the DWP themselves have said in response to questions from Susan Elan Jones MP i.e. ‘…the benefit is backdated so NO ONE is left out of pocket’. The current system is in no way equitable and victimises long term disabled people.
There is a petition at https://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/66447
Also let us know if this has happened to you by emailing : mail@dpac.uk.net

Urgent – Legal Challenge to PIP 20 metre descriptor to be held in Birmingham Administrative Court, Bull Street next week on July 9th and 10th.
The solicitors have asked for a room for observers to the case and are waiting for confirmation of that. They would like anyone who can to attend to show how important this case is to disabled people.
There will also be a vigil outside the court from 1- 2pm on July 9th. Bring placards, banners and friends and supporters.
To get updates on room availability and to check the case will not be affected by strike action on July 10th please email
birminghambenefitjustice@gmail.com

DPAC would like to thank everyone for making last week’s (April 12 2014) National Conference such a huge success. There was a huge turnout with over 150 disabled activists from all over the UK including many new DPAC members attending, but just as important there were hundreds of members and supporters beyond the venue taking part through social media – watching the video live-stream, tweeting and sharing comments, views and sending messages of support. This was fantastic work by everyone and a truly inspiring collective effort.
Here’s a brief outline of how it went.
Programme
The day was timetabled into sections beginning with practical reports and voting on policy motions. This was followed by two workshop sessions and then a closing session for everyone to feedback on the day. Four workshops were available to choose from in each Workshop session. Detailed reports on these will follow later.
John McDonnell MP, a longstanding friend and supporter of DPAC, gave a rousing opening speech to encourage everyone and remind us of the victories achieved so far. He congratulated disabled people and DPAC for fighting back, along with our sister organisation Black Triangle and WoW Petition initiators
As he finished he mentioned his own recent health condition which he said he felt brought him closer to our movement. Ellen reacted quickly by giving him a DPAC t-shirt and declaring him a full DPAC member to instant applause and cheers.
Finances
The Finance Report showed a healthy state of affairs for the time being thanks to individual donations, t-shirt and badge sales plus grants from the Edge Fund, the Network for Social Change, Trust for London and the Andrew Wainwright Trust. More fund-raising is necessary going forward.
Motions
1. Government Honours
This proposed that any future candidates for the DPAC Steering Group could thwart the network and collective ethos of DPAC if they had received a national honour like an OBE or MBE. The ‘BE’ refers to the imperialist British Empire which is still celebrated despite what we know of the suffering and oppression this caused. The motion conversations also suggested that any media attention would be focused on those with honours and titles, rather than on the collective network ethos that DPAC ascribes to. The motion was put forward as a rejecting of this possibility and that of the honours system more generally. This was defeated.
2. Discrimination
This motion stated DPAC opposition to discrimination on the grounds of gender, sexuality, age, faith, disability, ethnicity or status. It also empowered the Steering Group to terminate the membership of anyone who supported a party which holds discriminatory policies, like UKIP. This motion passed based on an appeals process being put in place
3. Steering Group Size
This motion sought to expand the Steering Group from 8 members to 12 in order to respond to increased activity and maintain a broad, diverse and inclusive profile. This was passed.
Steering Group
There were 11 nominees for the Steering Group. Conference took a vote on whether to vote for accepting all 11 nominees, or vote for them one by one. Conference voted to accept all 11 nominees. The new steering group are currently reviewing co-opted places and will get back to the additional people that applied past the deadline as soon as possible
Steering Group:
Andy Greene
Bob Ellard
Ciara Doyle
Conan Doyle
Debbie Jolly
Eleanor Firman
Ellen Clifford
Linda Burnip
Paula Peters
Roger Lewis
Sabina Lahur
It was highlighted that the working groups are important in taking DPAC forward. The co-chair said she hoped those who did not stand for the Steering Group but were still interested in getting involved would join these as soon as possible.
Finally, a big thank you to the Conference Organising group and Workshop leaders who worked so hard to make this wonderful event a reality.
Links to videos from the day are here with thanks to Occupy for live streaming on the day to make the conference inclusive to all are here
Links to pictures can be found on DPAC flicker here
Thanks to Pete Riches, Szucs Gabriella and Rob Peters
The powerpoint on highlights of the last year can be found DPAC Report
A link to 2013 and some of the things DPAC did is here
See you on the streets!
DPAC www.dpac.uk.net
Twitter: Dis_ppl_protest
Also find us on Facebook with a group and open page under ‘Disabled People against Cuts’
contact: mail@dpac.uk.net

We read with interest the piece in the Independent by Rachel Reeves and Kate Green regarding Labour’s response to the Work Capability Assessment [1]
Labour should realise that disabled people are deeply distrustful of any Labour reform of a Work Capability Assessment system, which Labour introduced in the Welfare Act of 2007 with the stated aim of removing 1 million claimants from the benefit system [3].
Our position has been and will be that the Work Capability Assessment is deeply flawed in its basic concept, not just in terms of the details of its delivery, and inclusion in the workplace for disabled people cannot simply be achieved by a ‘back to work’ test.
In the Reclaiming Our Futures, Disabled People’s Manifesto [4], we state that a priority demand from government is that:
A comprehensive and strategic plan of action is developed with disabled people and our organisations to tackle the discrimination and exclusion disabled people face in work and employment including: increasing quality and range of personalised support available to disabled people, strengthening disabled employees rights and tackling employer discrimination and poor practice
Other key demands include that:
Economic productivity must not be the only measure of people’s worth and value, volunteering offers as much value to society as paid employment. While we recognise that volunteering can offer additional skills, it should not be the default option for disabled people because of our exclusion from paid work
There must be policy and media recognition that there will always be disabled people who are unable or too ill to work. These individuals must be supported by a publically funded system. They should not be penalised or demonised as they are currently.
For true inclusion in the workplace for disabled people a wider approach is necessary including but not limited to:
• Will Labour commit to the restoration of Disabled Student’s Allowance,
• Will Labour commit to the restoration of the Independent Living Fund,
• Will Labour commit to the extension of Access to Work (AtW) to include unpaid voluntary positions,
• Will Labour commit to the reversal of the reduction of people who currently receive DLA, but will not receive PIP and also lose their Motability access,
• Will Labour commit to the reinstatement of the requirement for councils to produce equality schemes on employment and access
• Will Labour commit to the provision of accessible transport.
• Will Labour commit to the reinstatement of “day one” protection from unfair dismissal in employment law
• Will Labour commit to the provision of Employment Tribunals enforcing mandatory organisation-wide measures on preventing disability discrimination
• Will Labour commit to the provision that all government contracts, at a national, regional and local level, are only awarded to companies that are fulfilling measurable equality targets for the employment of disabled people
(for further points see reference 2)
These currently are some of the barriers to inclusion in the workplace for disabled people, and they will not be fixed by simply amending the WCA. The issue must be seen within the context of the wider interconnected system of barriers in place. It must be seen in terms of what a large majority of disabled people have already identified as key problems.
In terms of inclusion we also need from Labour, a recognition that for many disabled people to be able to work there has to be a nationally transportable social care system with a guarantee that people would keep the same levels of funding wherever they needed to move to work.
We need recognition that there is an onus on government and employers to fully accept the spirit of the Equality Act 2010 [4] with its requirement to the opening of work opportunity to disabled people. Without this, no “fit for work test” aimed at cutting disability benefits will make any impact whatsoever on the numbers of disabled people who can attain and sustain employment.
We also need from Labour a stronger recognition that there are many disabled people who cannot enter the work place and should not have to live in fear of being pressured into doing so.
There is much that the article leaves out and that leaves us with a number of serious concerns and questions.
While we are not yet prepared to endorse in any way Labour’s new approach to the Work Capability Assessment, we do see the article by Rachel Reeves and Kate Green as a helpful starting point for discussions on the future of inclusion of disabled people, who want and are able to work, in the workplace and we would welcome an opportunity to meet with them and discuss this further. We would like meet with Kate Green and Rachel Reeves to ask the following questions:
1. Will Labour commit to stop spending public money on private
contractors and return any assessments of disabled people back to GPs
with medical evidence taken into account as well as give a commitment to
look at the barriers to work for disabled people who can and want to
work (in line with the social model of disability)?
2. Will Labour commit to a time and date to talk with DPAC, My Legal,
the Mental Health Resistance Network, Black Triangle, Deaf activists,
those with learning difficulties ( with an outreach of ½ a million
disabled people) to listen to the views of the largest network of grass
roots disabled people on the WCA and ESA?
3. If Labour are committed to scrapping the WCA when will Deaf and
disabled people, and those with mental health issues have sight of the
detail of any alternative Labour is proposing?
4. If Labour accepts the harm, devastation and premature deaths that have
been an outcome of the WCA why have they chosen to suspend their
prospective parliamentary candidate for St Austell and Newquay, Deborah
Hopkins for speaking out in public about the harm caused by the WCA.
5. Will Labour address the disproportionate harm that the WCA and
sanctions on ESA and JSA are causing to all disabled people, in
particular those with mental health issues and learning difficulties?
6. We along with many others insisted that a centralised Independent Living Fund
for Scotland be established and it has been done. They have also promised to re-open ILF to new users, with a commitment of additional funds and recognition of its importance to independent living and obligations to article 19 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Why has the Labour
Party not promised to re-establish it south of the border?
Many of the Statements included in this response are taken from the UK Disabled Peoples’ Reclaiming our Futures Manifesto and are endorsed by a UK network of disabled people and Deaf and Disabled Peoples Organisations, including: ALLFIE, Inclusion London, Equal Lives, DPAC, Inclusion Scotland, Disability Wales and the TUC Disabled Workers Committee [2], who between them reach several million disabled voters.
References
1. How Labour would reform the Work Capability Assessment https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/how-labour-would-reform-the-work-capability-assessment-9265479.html
2. The Reclaiming Our Futures, Disabled People’s Manifesto https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/UK-Disabled-People-s-Manifesto-Reclaiming-Our-Futures.pdf
3. The Green Paper: The new deal for welfare: Empowering people to work. 2006 https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/https://dwp.gov.uk/docs/a-new-deal-for-welfare-empowering-people-to-work-full-document.pdf
4. Equality Act 2010 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents

The ‘One Show’ are looking for people who have had or are waiting for a PIP assessment with CAPITA. CAPITA carry out assessments in the midlands, parts of Yorkshire and in Wales only (please see map with postcodes to identify if you are in a CAPITA PIP area).
If would be happy to talk about your experiences to Donna a film maker from the One Show in Manchester please read on -talking to Donna does mean you need to appear in the film , but obviously all that can will help get the message out on PIP. Filming will start week beginning 21st April- so please get in touch with Donna immediately-
see below for more details and contacts for Donna, and please contact Donna directly with any questions, not DPAC
The controversial Personal Independence Payments, brought in last year to replace Disability Living Allowance have been heavily criticised for causing ‘distress and financial difficulties’ to long-term ill and disabled people, due to the long waiting times and differences in the PIP assessment such as the new 20m rule.
In this film I would like to meet some of the people behind the headlines and the statistics. I want to get across as much information about PIPs – in a clear and visually interesting way– in order to both engage the audience and get the main points across.
We are looking for people case studies of PIP
I would really like to meet some people who have had or are waiting for a PIP assessment, and find out their experience of PIP so far, and how it has affected them and their families everyday lives. The film will hopefully involve two such case studies, as well as a presenter who will be there to meet our case studies and chat to them about PIPs.
There is a possibility that we would like the case studies experiencing PIPs assessments to get the chance to meet Stephen Duckworth from Capita so they can ask him any questions, that they might have about PIPs. They would also be able to have a representative from a local organization with them when they do this as support, if needed.
For this reason, we are currently only looking to feature PIPs Case Studies that have been assessed or are waiting to be assessed by a company called Capita (not Atos case studies). Capita assesses in The Midlands, Wales, and some areas of the north such as Yorkshire.
At this stage, it would just be good to chat to as many people as possible about their experience applying for and being assessed for PIPs, and if you talk to me, you are under no obligation to take part in the programme, and our conversations would be confidential.
If anyone would like to talk to me, please pass on your names and numbers to me with a good time to call, or you can get in touch with me on 07774027012 or email me at donna.wood01@bbc.co.uk. I am available at evenings and weekends too!
Notes on Logistics of filming:
The film will be a short film of around 4 and half minutes long that will be shown on The One Show, in about 3 weeks time (date TBC could be a bit sooner or later than that!).
The film will prerecorded, and then some of the issues raised in the film will be discussed in studio with the presenter. Filming will take place on one day on the week beginning 21st April.

We are very much looking forward to seeing everyone who can come to our national conference on Saturday but it is also important that those of you who can’t get there in person are able to take part. There are a number of ways you can do this:
https://bambuser.com/channel/OccupyLondon and https://bambuser.com/channel/DPAC
Or email: mail@dpac.uk.net
The program for the day is at DPAC Conference 2014 Saturday 12th April – Conference Programme

We’ve had a great response to bookings for the DPAC conference on Sat 12th April in London, but places are now running out. Please email: dpacfightback@yahoo.co.uk
with your details, number of places needed and any access needs.
12th April 2014 – 11am until 5pm
London Met University, Tower Building, 166 – 220 Holloway Road, London, N7 8DP
Since we started in October 2010 Disabled People Against Cuts has been at the forefront of the fight against austerity. With Atos on the run, and the bedroom tax on the ropes we are seeing the results of hard campaigning. But there is much more to do to ensure disabled people’s rights to live independently and with an adequate income.
The national conference is a chance for DPAC members to come together, to share experiences and discuss your ideas for moving forwards.
DPAC are working hard to bring to conference a surprise guest, a person who, if anyone has, has been the catalyst for the re-emergence of disability activism in the last few years, someone DPAC has enjoyed a close relationship with from visiting him at home to donating underpants to supporting his select committee appearances.
Workshops will look at: – Where Now for the Independent Living Fund campaign, – Developing a Social Model of Distress, – Winning the Argument, – Disability, Art and Protest, – Building a National Network of Disabled People’s Organisations and Direct Action practical skills among others.
Please note places are limited so priority will be given to DPAC members. For information about joining please contact mail@dpac.uk.net
The venue is wheelchair accessible. BSL and a note taker will be provided. For access information go to: https://www.disabledgo.com/access-guide/islington-council/london-metropolitan-university-tower-building
For access queries including booking parking please contact DPACfightback@yahoo.co.uk
To book places or for more information please contact DPACfightback@yahoo.co.uk