Sep 292013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

Dear all,

During DPAC’s recent week of action we were supported by Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (OCAP) who held a solidarity protest outside the British Consulate in Toronto.

We’ve now been approached for help and messages of support for their week of action staring October 14th as the Ontario government is planning to impose cuts to disability benefits similar to the attacks disabled people are facing in the UK.

John from OCAP says “Unlike the UK, where the Liberal Party lost it place in the front ranks sometime after Lloyd George went to his reward, the Liberals in Canada have remained a dominant party all along.  They are hanging on in Ontario as a minority government and would like to be middle of the road but the austerity agenda won’t let them.  They are preparing at attack on disability benefits but are frantic to make it look kinder and gentler. That’s why comparing them to Cameron’s regime is so important and quite valid. That’s why support statements from the UK and people fighting back there are so incredibly helpful to us.”

Please take a few minutes from what I know are busy days for all of you to send a message of support for their fight back to ocap@tao.ca

Many thanks

Linda and DPAC team 

THREAT TO DISABILITY BENEFITS IN ONTARIO POSED BY MERGER OR OW AND ODSP

   Many people living on the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) have strong and

well founded concerns about the possibility of regressive ‘reforms’ to that system.  While the Wynne Government has made no official announcements as yet, the warning signs are very clear that disabled people on social assistance are going to be facing an austerity driven challenge to their rights and incomes.

The first thing to note is that an attack on social benefits for disabled people seems to be a strategic priority for the architects of austerity at the present time.  In the US, media and politicians are claiming that federal disability benefit applications are rising due to unemployed people making bogus claims so as to enjoy higher incomes than could be obtained through jobless benefits.  The newly elected right wing Abbott Government in Australia can also be expected to make an attack on disability benefits a major part of its program.

However, at the present time, it is the Cameron Government in the UK that can perhaps be seen as the cutting edge of a socially regressive drive to attack disabled people and their right of access to social benefit systems.  Cameron, through his Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), has intensified a previously existing Work Capability Assessment under which people who are sick or disabled are interviewed and graded as to their ‘fitness to work’.  The system has been modified so that private companies handle the actual assessment process.  Most notorious of these is the French company, Atos Healthcare.  The nature of this privatised assessment process is quite appalling.  People with terminal illnesses, serious impairments and progressive conditions have been deemed ‘fit to work’ regardless of medical evidence and common decency.  A hidden camera, taken into an Atos training session, shows a supervisor indicating that the standards for ‘manual dexterity’ will be met if someone can use a computer keyboard with one finger.  So extreme and reckless has this whole process been that a staggering 10,000 a year are dying within six weeks of being declared ‘fit to work’.

The nature of what is occurring in the UK leads us to rethink what is meant by an austerity agenda.  It appears to be moving beyond simply restricting or reducing entitlements and taking the form or outright social abandonment regardless of the human cost.  Given this situation, we must consider the implications for right here in Ontario.

The Hudak Tories are quite open about their intention to eliminate ODSP but we should not disregard the danger posed by the less candid Liberals.  The Wynne Government may have maintained the rhetoric of ‘poverty reduction’ but its orientation and actions to date can leave little room to hope that it intends to break with the pattern of regressive austerity as it fashions a version of ‘social assistance reform’ for this Province.  The Commission for the Review of Social Assistance that the Liberals established, proposes that Ontario Works (OW) and ODSP be merged and delivered at the municipal level.  More than this, however, it seeks to redefine the basic nature of providing income support to disabled people.  Under its model, everything would be defined in terms of employability.  The process of reassessing people would be stepped up and ‘employer’s councils’ work to push disabled people into competing for jobs.

While the report is careful to couch everything in the language of ‘disability rights’, it pays scant attention to the context in which it advocates pushing people into employment.  The low wage sector in Ontario has swollen massively in recent years. The minimum wage has been frozen for three years and most poor people in the Province actually subsist on low wages.  A ‘reform’ model that simply assumes that employed poverty is inherently a better option is massively problematic.  To take a whole new population of people and force them to compete for precarious, low paying jobs can only worsen the situation.  Moreover, the example of what is unfolding in the UK and the situation facing injured workers here leads us to conclude that the likelihood is that many would be declared able to work in disregard of their actual ability to obtain employment.  The WSIB in Ontario is already operating along lines very similar to Cameron’s DWP by way of an assessment process for injured workers that routinely ‘deems’ people capable of performing work they have no realistic chance of obtaining.  There seems little reason to expect that a redesigned system of social assistance for the disabled would chart any very different course.

The international austerity agenda is targeting disabled people and their social benefits and that approach is looming before us in Ontario.  We need to be aware of this and organize in our communities to build an effective opposition to all such measures.

 

 

 

 Posted by at 17:41
Sep 282013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

Just less than 3 years ago disabled people marched at the Tory party conference to protest against austerity cuts using the slogan CUTS KILL. Even though it was obvious that the plans outlined by millionaire George Osborne in the June 2010 Spending Review would not be good for disabled people even we did not envisage just how fast our welfare state would be destroyed by the Condems or how many disabled people would be pushed to suicide or death through the malicious Condem cuts.

 

We could not have imagined that 3 years later we’d be getting daily emails from disabled people and pregnant disabled people who were actually starving and being left without food, money or access to any hardship payments. We knew but couldn’t have possibly imagined that disabled people would have their benefits stopped for weeks and in some cases months without any means to support themselves other than possible prostitution, drug dealing or theft. What do you do when you are already living on the breadline with no savings and your only income is taken away? We never imagined we’d read about children, disabled and non-disabled being left without food.

 

It’s hard to believe it’s the UK we’re talking about yet this is what life has become for many in the 21st century in the 7th richest nation in the world. We never imagined that we’d go so far backwards that all of the gains made for disabled people’s rights over the last 30 years would effectively just be swept away as disabled people are vilified as shirkers and scroungers.

 

10,000 Cuts and Counting is a single issue protest against the now discredited computerised Work Capability Assessment executed by ATOS. It has pushed so many disabled people to suicide or death through fear and stress that DWP have now stopped collecting any statistics on the death count but between January 2011 and November 2011, some 10,600 claims ended and a date of death was recorded within six weeks of the claim end. DPAC and other campaigners are proud to have destroyed the ATOS brand name but there is no point in just replacing ATOS with another corporate monster and the WCA must be scrapped in its entirity. Why should any private firm rake in millions and millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money to provide a totally flawed service which could be provided by civil servants for a fraction of the cost as has been the case until recently? The WCA was put in place to cut the number of claimants by 1 million either through miracle cures or death it seems.

 

One of the next major battles disabled people face is the scrapping of Disability Living Allowance put in place to meet the extra costs of being disabled. This too has been designed with only one aim in mind to cut costs and remove 20% of disabled people from entitlement. Many disabled people rely on this income to enable them to work and will no longer be able to if it is lost to them. Even more will be left trapped in their homes with no means to go out.

 

For anyone who thinks this doesn’t matter to them 6 out of 7 disabled people have an acquired impairment through long term illness or an accident. Most of you will also get older and so how older disabled people are treated should be of great concern to you – it’s your future. Let’s not be polite older disabled people are often treated worse than animals in the UK getting 4 x 15 minutes ‘pop ins’ if they’re lucky and imprisoned in their homes and some left soaking wet the rest of the time.

 

This is the fate now awaiting younger disabled people from 2015 when without any vote in parliament the Independent Living Fund will be closed leaving local councils to try to replace this funding with ever shrinking budgets and different eligibility criteria.

 

At the same time they say they want disabled people to work but without this vital support even if found fit for work they are unable to. The Remploy factories have been decimated in the Condem attacks against disabled people supported by some organisations who purport to campaign for us. At last count only about 3% of those made redundant had secured mainstream employment but given the barriers to gaining and keeping employment that disabled people face this was always likely. To this we need to add the benefit cap which is in effect a futher cut.

 

The Bedroom Tax so loudly condemned by the UN rapporteur Raquel Rolnik existed in the private rented sector since 2008 and Labour who introduced this have singularly forgotten to mention that they originally also planned to roll it out in April 2010 to the social housing sector. None of us should forget that most of these horrors now affecting both disabled and other people were in many cases introduced by Labour and it is time for all of us all to start to tell them what they must do if they want to have a chance of being elected.

 

It is also way past time for the larger unions to stop pussy-footing around, stop unconditionally supporting a neo-liberal Labour party and force them to act as an effective opposition and outline their real policies. The unions and TUC should have already called a general strike but need to do so now urgently. It is time to add industrial power to community activism if any vestiges of our welfare state are to be salvaged for our children.

 

Disabled people and others also face a further raft of cuts and attacks to the NHS and in particular mental health services, to health and safety at work legislation, to Access to Work funding, to secure employment and not zero hours contracts, to accessible transport, to accessible housing, a right to mainstream education, cuts to council tax benefit, all coupled with cuts to CAB services, legal aid cuts and lastly the introduction of the Lobbying Bill which regardless of it’s eventual outcome will not silence us in any way. We are now many thousands and we will be heard.

This piece is also due to be published in the Morning Star

 

 

Sep 272013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

Below is the full presentation given by Alison Wilde at the Accentuate conference, earlier this year.  It’s about the paralympian legacy, that thing that McVey can’t pass a journalist without cooing about how wonderful everything is now for disabled people. That thing that we might remember as DPAC ‘s Atos games where we shifted the view of Atos and watched  their shares tumble, while the negative media coverage of the damage of the WCA exploded see:https://dpac.uk.net/2013/09/dpac-report-work-capability-assessment/

Maybe this legacy is also about Gideon Osborne being booed by the entire stadium https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqM0Ube0oLs

For us Alison makes some crucial points that set this ‘legacy’ issue in the framework of the real threats and oppression that disabled people face . …

I was delighted when I was invited to take part in today’s event, but have to admit my first thought was to decline the invitation because I know next to nothing about the Paralympics and, if I’m honest, had little interest in the television and media coverage of it, apart from the possibility that we might see new cultural representations of disabled people – something I AM very interested in.

However, my identity as a disabled person makes me very interested in disabled athletes – but I want them all to do well generally, especially as my ideas of belonging are more tied up with disabled people rather than my national identity and team GB. Even so, I have such an aversion to sport that I subconsciously avoided most of the television coverage but it was impossible to escape the news coverage of the event and the lionisation of particular athletes, so I find myself knowing more than I’d like to.

So, unsurprisingly I thought I wasn’t a suitable person to speak today until I got to thinking that my responses to sport were actually central to some of the debates about legacy. Although we use all use the word ‘legacy ’I am sure that we don’t all mean the same thing. Before the games, official statements of legacy promised improvements in sports venues, new homes, transport links and the regeneration of communities. Over time, this seems to have changed somewhat, in line with a more individualistic political focus which emphasises people’s health habits and ways of living.  Beyond this, the word legacy seems to have taken on other meanings.  Having trawled though a number of articles, and putting to one side the idea that discussions of legacy are promoted to provide a justification for massive expenditure on public events when the welfare state is being demolished (another reason I chose to avoid the games), the notion of legacy seems to be interpreted in two main ways, both of which could be seen as positive.

The first understanding of legacy seems to relate to the effects of the Paralympics on public attitudes to disabled people (and disabled people’s belief in themselves).  For example, Lord Coe spoke of the legacy of the Paralympics in terms of ‘a seismic effect in shifting public attitudes’ which would have lasting benefits. The second main way that legacy seems to be interpreted is in discussions of how we can provide better opportunities for disabled people to take up, or become more interested in sport.

Before I go on to talk a little more about legacy I just want to say that I don’t feel qualified to say anything about the gains made for disabled athletes per se and that questions such as this and how we map new territory for potential future athletes and paralympians are best answered by those who are involved, an area which is clearly outside my knowledge.

2. Legacy.

 My own lack of interest in sport of any kind is a position which seems to resonate with one of these central themes; such uninterest or beliefs that we are unsuited for sports, can be closely related to an array of cultural discourses which are persuasive in making people think sport and achievement is ‘not for them’ (from media representations, to PE teachers’ attitudes and public attitudes about the normal or ideal body). If the need to persuade more disabled people to take up sports is the major theme in legacy debates then part of the solution becomes one of how to build people’s ideas of their own personal value and to provide encouragement and facilities to seek higher forms of achievement, through better education leisure services and the media for example.  I am also ambivalent about ideas of achievement which can reinforce prescriptive ideas of social valued roles and lifestyles and am not convinced that disabled people are not inspired and motivated in the first place. In fact, I firmly believe that many disabled and ill people are being forced into such untenable circumstances that getting through the day can and should be seen in itself as an achievement against unsurmountable odds.

Media has a central role to play in this and much of the coverage I saw of the paralympians seemed to shift away from less pity-orientated representations towards images of disabled people as super-human. The Channel 4 campaign was actually named ‘meet the superhumans’,   reinforced by the title of Public Enemy’s song ‘Harder than you think’.  This advertisement, asking us to forget everything we previously thought, was arguably a preferable image to previous coverage of the Paralympics, in that it at least echoed the treatment given to non-disabled Olympic athletes, reflecting similar images of strength and invincibility. Statistics on audiences might indicate that these portrayals worked well with record-breaking audience figures; two thirds of people surveyed in a Channel 4 survey said that the coverage had a good impact on their perceptions of disabled people, and most viewers considered disabled people to be equally talented as non- disabled athletes (Channel 4 survey, BDRC continental and YouGov).

However, as positive as raising people’s aspirations to be superhuman may sound, I think it is crucial to examine how such concepts of achievement are ideologically loaded, how they feed the cult of celebrity culture and serve to maintain, or exacerbate, social hierarchies and cultural stereotypes which reinforce negative public attitudes and legitimate cuts in income and services etc, especially in this climate.

 Despite the dim view I am taking of legacy here, I do think that anyone who has high ambitions should be supported and get opportunities to pursue their goals but I think we should be wary of the way we use portrayals of success and that we should take a critical view of what we mean by legacy, particularly as this often seems to be a deficit-led concept, when used in discussions of the Paralympics and Olympics. I think this can work to distract us away from any real investments in our collective futures (such deficit led images were exemplified in a recent pro-sport advert I saw on the underground which was premised on the idea of channeling young, working class men’s tendencies towards violence into sporting achievements).

So, I believe that even the battle for defining legacy, on our terms, is going to be tough, framed as it is in individualistic terms of our lack, our need for motivation and the huge chasm between portrayals of elite athletes and images of ordinary disabled people, both of which are anchored in the emerging bio-psycho-social model of disability being promoted by the likes of UNUM and Atos (a major Paralympic sponsor). Debbie Jolly and others involved with DPAC have warned us of the dangers of the Americanised ‘can do’ ethos and the ‘new paralympian politics of the welfare state’ (i.e. the manufacturing of scarcity, the psychologising and demonization of disabled people and others amongst the poorest in society). Although I’m guessing that most of us are aware of this increasingly influential model of disability, for anyone who doesn’t, this new model is defined by UNUM in these terms:

‘Illness, Sickness and Incapacity are Psychosocial rather than medical problems. More and better healthcare is not the answer.’

Reflecting Cameron’s statement that the paralympics would ‘teach people what they can do, rather than what they can’t do’ it is obvious that the legacy of the Paralympics will be approached the same way in terms of sports provision; that it is up to us to improve our attitudes and slay all our barriers, that we should buy our opportunities rather than expect better provision for education, sports and cultural facilities.

On a slightly more positive note, in terms of legacy, I do feel that the Paralympics have provided an important site for contesting disabling imagery and attitudes, not least because they received such a wide audience but also because analysis of Paralympics coverage exposes some of the dilemmas of cultural imagery and public attitudes which have proved difficult to resolve. This event is one such opportunity and hopefully this will contribute to further change, especially in highlighting and challenging the dualistic ways in which media tends to work; in this case going from patronising portrayals of us as abject to images of superhumans, doing little to acknowledge the multiple realities of living with disability and impairment.

 

3. Before I finish I want to say something about segregation. There is another important issue I think we must grapple with; the continuing separation of disabled people from non-disabled people in sport (and elsewhere), and of course, the further separation of disabled people into the Paralympics and the Special Olympics.

 

An academic article, ‘Crippling Paralympics?: Media, Disability and Olympism’ (Goggin, Gerard; Newell, Christopher) argues that the paralympics fits well within the established power relations which oppress people with disability in society.

They say:

‘While there have been some changes and improvements, we contend that overwhelmingly, the separation between the Paralympics and Olympics is not questioned and that if the Paralympics are reported at all disabling media representations still very much persist’.

 

I understand that this is not a simple matter and understand some of the complexity for finding solutions to these dilemmas. I also want to mention here that this paralympian category of ‘disabled people’ is not inclusive due to the absence and the exclusion of people with learning difficulties who, as we all know, are further segregated in the special Olympics and importantly here from discussions of legacy.

Concluding comments

As you can see, I believe that the concept of legacy of the Paralympics and Olympics in overwhelmingly a political one. Sadly, it is my belief that any gains which may have been made in terms of the representations of disabled people and challenges towards public attitudes are marginal when considered against the kind of news coverage of disabled people found by Nick Watson’s study[i]. If Lord Coe was right in his analysis of the positive change in public attitudes, it is clear that there is much to be done in building on any gains made, and that we will need to fight to get a real legacy for all of us – starting with key areas such as employment, media representations, hate crimes, welfare which helps us live our lives, education, housing, public building and transport.

The Chief executive of the British Paralympic Association, Tim Hollingsworth said that the paralympics was successful in making people realise that disability is not the issue and that is the ‘quality of the individual’ and ‘their ability to do things that matter.’  Although this is clearly true for competitive sport it cannot be transferred to disabled people as a group without selling out to the bio-psycho-social model which poses a threat to so many of us.

Sep 272013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

While New Labour are urging the condemns to sack Atos, let’s not lose sight of the real issue-that is that the WCA is not fit for purpose and must be scrapped!

The report contains coverage from the UK media put together in one place. It has hundreds of entries over the years up to Sept 2013

See: https://www.scribd.com/doc/170710160/DPAC-Report-Work-Capability-Assessment-UK-Media-Coverage

To read/download the report- along with other DPAC research reports on ILF, WCA and IDS lies.

Sep 212013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

The Disability Research Consortium (DRC) includes a range of partners from active disability user-led organisations and grass roots groups. They include DPAC, Inclusion London, Equal Lives ( formerly NCODP) and ALLFIE. We are asking disabled people to tell us what key things that need to change? Which barriers need to be broken in the long term? How can we make this happen together?

We believe that disabled people need to lead the change and take our issues forward. The questions here will help towards that process, and towards our fight-back on our lives and independence. Any questions please email: DisabilityRC@gmail.com

 We thank you in advance for taking the time to fill in the survey

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/WYZVQXV

drc logo

 Twitter: @DisabilityDRC

Sep 182013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

In 2005 I had been a retired philosophy teacher in the Netherlands for several years. Pensioned civil servants were entitled to a rebate on their medical costs. It wasn’t much, but I liked this State-run system, called ZVO. In that year the international consultancy firm KPMG began managing ZVO. It worked well until 1 Jan 2006, when the Dutch healthcare system was almost completely privatized (the first in the EU). ZVO was abolished in order to enact a new health insurance law [1]. KPMG engineered this by paying out less and less each year after that, ‘to ease the pain,’ as we were told. I did not know that ZVO was outsourced to KPMG in 2005.

Privatization gave the insurers near-total control over medical financing. Provisions were dangerously downgraded, to increase profits. In December 2008 a specialist informed me that I had a life-threatening illness. I was 66 and found an age limit of 65 for adequate treatment. I moved to Uppsala Sweden, where specialists saved my life [2]. How could the supposedly humanitarian EU allow such practices (many residents were disadvantaged)? I decided to investigate and stumbled upon Atos, an information technology (IT) company that began by fusing the French IT firm Origin and part of Philips (Dutch) in 1996. It acquired the British and Dutch divisions of KPMG Consultancy in 2002 [3], was named Atos Origin and became Atos after further expansion in 2011[4].

The firm’s Atos Healthcare section (UK) began work for DWP in 1998. It is contracted to them through to 2015 [5]. Its morally and medically questionable disability benefit assessment programme has received a good deal of publicity. The revelations, including claims of at least 10,600 resultant deaths, are forcing a reorganisation of this work [6].

 In 2009 Mark Britnell, a former high NHS civil servant, became ‘Head of Healthcare, Europe and UK’ for KPMG; he is now an advisor to the British government. At an international health conference organised by industry in 2010, he remarked that ‘[T]he NHS will be shown no mercy’ in the coming privatizations, and that it would be ‘a state insurance provider, not a state deliverer’ [7]. In effect, it will take your money and distribute it to many businesses, from groups of GPs upwards. The need for profits in this model will necessarily reduce the quality and quantity of care, since when profits are subtracted from the total insurance input, less cash is available for reinvestment. This is happening in Sweden and the Netherlands now, with variations due to differences in their political systems.

Britnell might well be influencing the privatization of the NHS. Since KPMG’s Dutch branch was part of Atos Origin in 2006, its financial destruction of ZVO helped privatize healthcare in the Netherlands. Atos is not just an IT company: it is a danger to EU public health [8].

                                             

1.     https://vpwnet.wordpress.com/2006/02/02/einde_van_de_zvo_regeling/

2.      I describe this affair in Red Pepper, June/July 2009.

3.      https://atos.net/en-us/home/we-are/news/press-release/2002/pr-2002_06_05_01.html

4.      https://atos.net/en-us/home/we-are/company-profile/company-history.html

5.      https://www.atoshealthcare.com/claimants/in_partnership_with_the_dwp

6.      https://mikesivier.wordpress.com/2012/11/03/new-call-to-put-dwpatos-on-trial-for-manslaughter/. Caution is advised here. Although the government released the figure of 10,600 deaths in nine months of 2011, we do not know how many of these are directly attributable to the assessment regime, e.g. from stress, cardiovascular issues, and undiagnosed or untreated illnesses. (Atos does not investigate these. It looks only at basic behavioural and mental capacities, not medical causes of incapacity.)

7.      https://www.spinwatch.org/index.php/issues/lobbying/item/5343-%E2%80%9Cthe-nhs-will-be-shown-no-mercy-says-cameron-health-adviser, https://www.powerbase.info/images/f/fe/Apax_Healthcare_conference_2010.pdf.

8.      I am indebted to Andy Cropper for ideas, information and support during the past year or so. He has done us a service by compiling this thread of data about the NHS:

      https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150607105601288.

    George Berger, Uppsala Sweden, 10 September 2013

With many thanks to George for his permission to repost on DPAC

Originally posted at https://www.dorseteye.com/north/articles/atos-kpmg-and-the-nhs-be-afraid-be-very-afraid

Sep 172013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

On the 14th October, five ILF users will appeal against the previous court decision that the ILF consultation was carried out fairly at the Royal Courts of Justice. DPAC will be there again and, again have a vigil outside the courts to show support-we will update with further details as they become available.

The initial court case showed that the funds for ILF when transferred to local authorities will cover just one year, something that local authorities did not appear to be made aware of by this Government. A write up from those documents can be found here: https://dpac.uk.net/2013/03/summary-of-secret-correspondence-from-the-dwp-to-mcvey-on-the-ilf-closure/

In the meantime you might like to see some of the stories from those at risk of losing the support to independent living at https://dpac.uk.net/independent-living-fund/

 As many of you know the Mental Health Resistance Network are appealing against the DWP that the WCA is detrimental to those with mental health issues. DPAC wants to be there to support them.  The appeal will be heard on Monday 21st October to Tuesday 22nd October 2013. The vigil will happen outside the royal courts of justice on Monday 21st October at 12 noon until 2 pm.

The WCA is detrimental to everyone, but the obvious added stress, anxiety and lack of Atos professionalism in gaining supporting evidence is particularly severe for those with mental health issues. This system is breaking and we must keep up the pressure for the inhumane WCA to be scrapped completely, as DPAC has always argued.

 Keep checking the DPAC web or twitter for updates

Sep 172013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net


10 Thousand Cuts and Counting is a ceremony of remembrance and solidarity led by disability activists, Occupy activists, Michael Meacher MP and the Dean of St Paul’s Cathedral for those who have had their lives devastated by the austerity programme, including more than 10,000 people who died shortly after undergoing the Atos Work Capability Assessment, the degrading test used by the government to assess the needs of people receiving benefits related to disability and ill health.

With all welcome to attend, the event will include Atos testimonies, prayers, silence and meditations, a carpet of white flowers on Parliament Square with poetry, choral music and scenes acted by disabled artists depicting experiences of Atos.

The gathering will demand an immediate end to the Work Capability Assessment, as voted for by the British Medical Association, and a New Deal for disabled people based on their needs, abilities and ambitions as outlined in the WOW petition.

28th September • Parliament Square • London • 12 noon

Disabled people are leading the fight back against the injustices of austerity: we cannot stand idly by while our communities and institutions are devastated by this government.

On Saturday 28th September, the disabled and non-disabled community will gather to remember those who have died and those still suffering as a result of the Government’s austerity assault, which particularly affects disabled people.

The ceremony will remember those who have died and those living who are having their independence and dignity challenged as a result of austerity.

A delegation from the gathering will present to the Prime Minister THE DOWNING STREET DEMAND, in support of the demands set out in the WOW petition (https://wowpetition.com/), which has been signed by 52,000 people and calls for an immediate end to degrading way in which the government assesses the support needs given to valuable people in our community and a New Deal for disabled people based on their needs, abilities and ambitions.

This government is reducing the Welfare State in a way which creates even more economic and social inequality and does not save the country money – this cannot be allowed to continue.

This is what austerity looks like. Come and join us.

Timetable

The People’s Gathering at Parliament – 12pm – Parliament Square

Delivering The Downing Street Demand – 1pm

For more information please see www.10Kcuts.org

Other information

Clothing. Please wear white clothing as a symbol of remembrance. If this is not possible, a white scarf or other small item would be useful. Please also bring a white flower if you would like to lay one in remembrance
Access: Nearest tube: Westminster – step free. Buses: 3, 11, 12, 24, 53, 87, 88, 159, 453. Please get in touch with any specific access enquiries or requests.

Further details regarding accessibility and transport options tbc.

—————————————————-

10 Thousand Cuts and Counting has been called by Occupy London activists and David Ison, the Dean of St Paul’s Cathedral.

 

www.10Kcuts.org – #10KCuts – https://www.facebook.com/events/167401616782754/

Contact email: 10kcutscounting@gmail.com

 

 

Sep 172013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

Based on the advice and guidance given by Just Fair Consortium members during the 11th July evidence gathering meeting, the Just Fair Consortium is currently working with disabled people and DPAC to produce a report examining the right to independent living in the austerity era. 

 Just Fair will launch the report in the Houses of Parliament in late November 2013.

 Within this remit, the report will analyse the following issues:

 * Personal Independence Payment (PIP);

* Under-occupancy penalty (“Bedroom tax”/”Spare room subsidy”);

* ‘Benefit cap’;

* Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) and the Work Capability Assessment (WCA);

* Universal Credit;

* Cuts to social care; and

* Closure of the Independent Living Fund. 

 Disabled people are leading on all elements of the research and advocacy work, including selection of the report theme and sub-issues, submission of real-life case-studies, contribution of hard-hitting statistical analysis and presentation of testimony evidence at the November report launch. 

 DPAC have sent Just Fair a number of reports and case studies. We will keep you updated, in the meantime if you have anything you’d like included, please email us at: mail@dpac.uk.net

The Just Fair website can be found at https://just-fair.co.uk/

 

Sep 142013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

BENEFITS JUSTICE CAMPAIGN 

THREATENED WITH EVICTION ? DON’T PANIC ! DON’T DESPAIR!

 You can only be evicted by a Judge and only if:

“It would be reasonable to leave and .. you will able to suggest to the court that it is not reasonable ..” (Official ‘Notice Seeking Possession’ form that the landlord has to send you) 

LOADS OF DEBTS?  Phone Advice Sheffield for free debt counselling on 205 5055

BEDROOM TAX bill?  COUNCIL TAX bill? CANT PAY?

Apply for the Discretionary Housing Payment and Council Tax Hardship Fund by phoning 273 6983 or visit your local Housing Office. If you are refused you can appeal.

IF YOU ARE SENT A ‘NOTICE SEEKING POSSESSION’

Your landlord (the council or a housing association) must carry out the PRE-COURT ACTION PROTOCOL:

–         check if you are vulnerable because of age, illness, mental or physical condition, communication or language problem

–         check to see if you are getting the Housing Benefit you are entitled to

–         tell you where you can get help and advice

–         consider whether the Equalities Act 2010 applies to you

If they do not do this any case  they take to court could be thrown out

DON’T WAIT: DEFEND YOURSELF NOW!

Write out all the reasons why it would not be reasonable to evict you:

Make a detailed financial statement showing your income and expenditure proving you cant pay the extra rent and/or council tax because of cuts in your benefit. Disability benefits should be excluded.

Send this to your landlord at the address on the letter where they mention possible eviction

Keep copies to show any advisers you speak to.Get legal advice –see below.

                                                       APPLY FOR LEGAL AID

You can get legal aid if you are on low wages or benefits and at risk of losing your home. You will need proof of income e.g. wage slips or benefit letters for IS/JSA/ESA.

Solicitors who do housing cases:

Howells 7 Castle St, Castle Green S3 BLT tel 249 6666

Sheffield Law Centre Waverley House 10 Joiner St, S3 8GW

Norrie Waite & Slater 9-12 East Parade S1 2ET tel 276 6166

Tell them its about Notice Seeking Possession

WARRANTS FOR POSSESSION CAN BE STOPPED ! BAILIFFS CAN BE STOPPED! 

WHEN IS A BEDROOM NOT A BEDROOM?

–     when its too small e.g. less than 70 sq ft of useable space

–         when its used for another purpose eg. storing medical equipment

–         not fit to be used as a bedroom

If you think the council’s Housing Benefits decision to charge you for having ‘too many bedrooms’ is unfair you can still put in a late Appeal due to wholly exceptional circumstances’ – this should be done within 12 months of the original decision. A HB Tribunal in Fife just decided in favour of  a tenant who appealed. Your reasons could be Official Error or Mistake about a Material Fact. You can get help from an advice centre. Tel 205 5055.

YOU ARE NOT ALONE  – GET SUPPORT!

Tell your neighbours, friends and family to get together to form a support group.

Tell us and we will come to court to support you as well. Join our campaign to kick the Bedroom Tax and all the  benefit cuts into the long grass. Contact sheffieldbenefitjustice@gmail.com. Tel 07928766385 or 248 3937 or sheffieldagainstevictions@gmail.com tel 07579203968. Affiliated to the national campaign

Anti Bedroom Tax and Benefit Justice Federation at antibedroomtax.org.uk. Email benefitjustice@gmail.com

    JOIN OUR CAMPAIGN TO DEFEAT THE BEDROOM TAX AND ALL BENEFIT CUTS

many thanks to Shirley in Shefield for this information

 Posted by at 17:09
Sep 042013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

ALLFIE logo

DISABLED PEOPLE DEMAND INCLUSIVE EDUCATION NOW

Today Disabled People will be launching their “Reclaiming Our Futures” manifesto including a demand for a fully resourced inclusive education system and an end of segregation. The launch will be followed by a mass lobby of parliament.

The Alliance for Inclusive Education (ALLFIE) will be at the Department for Education from 1.00 pm on Wednesday 4th September reporting to Michael Gove and the Coalition Government on their failure to support our demand for inclusive education.

Since 2010 the Coalition Government have consistently failed to deliver on their commitment to provide choice of mainstream education provision for disabled learners despite their  international obligation under the UNCPD Article 24 to build the capacity of mainstream providers to become more inclusive of disabled children and young people

The Government’s failure to provide disabled learners with a right to participate in mainstream education and to provide the necessary resources and assistance that mainstream education providers need to make inclusion a genuine choice is a national disgrace.”  Says an ALLFIE spokesperson    

The SEN provisions in the Children and Families Bill will  mean that children and young people with SEN will no longer have a right to attend a mainstream school – the Bill is due to be debated in the House of Lords during October.

ALLFIE is the only disabled person led organisation working on the Children & Families and after being denied a meeting with Lord Nash to discuss out concerns, ALLFIE and the Disabled Peoples Movement are taking our inclusive education demands to him at the Department for Education.

Editors notes

Press contacts Tara Flood (CEO) 02077376030/07932750667 and Simone Aspis 0207 737 6030/07795 142 108

Alliance for Inclusive Education website www.allfie.org.uk

Children and Families Bill https://www.allfie.org.uk/pages/work/childrenfamsbill.html

Photo Opportunity: Michael Gove receiving his education report card outside the Department for Education.

 

Aug 262013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

Copy and paste below or download from link-your MP can be found at

   https://findyourmp.parliament.uk/ 

Dear MP,

I am writing as one of your constituents to invite you to attend the launch of the UK Disabled People’s Manifesto: Reclaiming Our Futures on 4th September 5 – 6pm in the House of Commons Committee room 9.

Current government policy on disability is in crisis with disabled people collectively feeling under attack from their own government; research shows that disabled people are being disproportionately impacted by the cuts with those with the most complex levels of support need being hit by austerity nineteen times harder than the average person (‘A Fair Society? How the cuts target disabled people’ by Simon Duffy).

With around 1 in 5 of the population being disabled and many more affected by disability as family, friends and carers or simply as citizens who care about social justice, policy and pledges on disability will be a key concern of many voters as we approach the next election.

Disabled people and our organisations have come together across the UK to develop a UK Disabled People’s manifesto setting out the key principles, demands and commitments that are important to Deaf and disabled people and our allies.

I hope you are able to join us on the 4th to explore what is needed to achieve a society where disabled people can live, work and participate as equal citizens. Copies of the manifesto will be available from Inclusion London (www.inclusion.co.uk or contact ellen.clifford@inclusionlondon.co.uk / 02072373181).

Yours sincerely,

Link to download letter in Word Dear MP

Aug 252013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

Birmingham

https://birminghamagainstthecuts.wordpress.com/2013/07/25/we-will-remember-the-victims-of-austerity-britian-and-oppose-the-dwp-which-broke-their-soul/

 

Saturday September 7th Broad Street job centre 1-2pm and Atos office, Five Ways, 2-3pm

 

Bristol

A gentle conference on the proposed closure of the Independent Living Fund

 

Wednesday 4 September 2013 City Hall, College Green, Bristol BS1 5TR

11.15am to 3.30pm

  

Free entrance, refreshments and buffet lunch plus people from local council.

To reserve a place and for more information, please contact:

 

Email:      independencebristol@gmail.com

Text:        07867 690422

 

Canary Wharf

29th August Day of action to make Crossrail fully accessible – Thursday 29th August 2013.

– See more at: https://dpac.uk.net/2013/07/day-of-action-to-make-crossrail-fully-accessible-thursday-29th-august-2013/#sthash.lqaDkIZ4.dpuf

DPAC Medway Leaflet drop 2PM Fri 30th ATOS 1A Bachelor Street Chatham ME4 4BJ

 

 Islington

www.daii.org

August 29th street party on Islington Green 12-4pm to help organise the fightback against the proposed closure of the Independent Living Fund.

 

Leamington Spa

August 31st noon bedroom tax protest  Town Hall

 

Protests against cuts to NHS and attacks against disabled people outside Chris White’s office
43a Clemens Street, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire CV31 2DP
 

 

Swansea

 

PROTEST AGAINST ATOS IN SWANSEA!
FIGHT ATTACKS ON DISABLED PEOPLE!
12pm Friday 30th August, outside Swansea Atos centre

https://www.facebook.com/events/181697292010875/

 

Norfolk


https://dpac.uk.net/2013/08/dpac-norfolk-reclaiming-our-rights-30th-august/

 

Reclaiming our Rights August 30th 12-2.30pm Job Centre Plus, Kiln House, Pottersgate, Norwich, NR2 1BZ

 

 Northampton

Sept 6th https://dpac.uk.net/2013/08/northampton-6th-sept-11-30-2pm-atos-asessing-the-assessors/

 

Wrexham Tuesday 3rd September : Protest against ATOS and their paymasters DWP by disabled people, claimants and supporters from 12.30 pm onwards outside the Jobcentre/ATOS on the corner at Grosvenor Road. Please bring banners, placards, whistles etc.

 

 

Everywhere:

Twitter event with Liz Crow  using https://inactualfact.org.uk/ for  Monday September 2nd

 

Armchair activism-to come

 

 

Being updated – please let us know what you are doing to add to list: email: mail@dpac.uk.net

 

 

Aug 222013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

Updated video of the excellent Condemn Love DPAC’s Anti-Atos song -with massive thanks once more to Kevin Robins for all his work on this. See Kevin perform live at Piss on Pity 31st August-part of the DPAC Reclaiming our Futures week of action.

Also watch this space for more news on how to download Condem Love and contribute to DPAC

 

Con-Dem Love!

They’re screwing up my mind , wasting my time
Keeping up the pressure on this heart of mine
They’ve got a real obsession , egos out of hand
Out to make a make a killing from their “welfare” scam.

This is Con-Dem love, Con-Dem love, Con-Dem love ,
Condemn .. … Con-Dem love.

Laid my cards on the table told their GP straight
Depressions biting hard and that’s hard to take
I showed him the scars on my arms where I’d cut
He looked me in the eye and said you’re “working fit”

This is Con-Dem love, Con-Dem love, Con-Dem love
They’re going to show you what they’re made of.

On a circle of emotion on the treadmill again
They took away my social, can’t pay the rent
What can do, so ill, I can’t fight,
I toss and turn I stay awake all night
Darkened thoughts are haunting me
I’m so afraid of this reality

This is Con-Dem love, Con-Dem love, Con-Dem love
They’re going to show you what they’re made of.

Sitting in a corner — with the lights switched off
This no win situation’s lost
Can’t make no plans for you or for me
There’s no reason to go on you see .

This is Con-Dem love, Con-Dem love, Con-Dem love
They’re going to show you what they’re made of.
They’re going to show you what they’re made of

They’re screwing up my mind, wasting my time
Keeping up the pressure on this heart of mine
They’ve got real obsession, egos out of hand
Out to make a make a killing from their “welfare” scam.

They’re screwing up my mind , taking away my life x 3

©  Robins/Clark

If you would like to know more about DPAC or make a contribution to our work please visit our website www.dpac.uk.net or email: mail@dpac.uk.net or twitter: @Dis_PPL_Protest *Special thanks to all including Rob Livingstone and Simon Gomery for some of the excellent artwork contribution on this video.

 

Aug 132013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

dpacxx

Reclaiming Our Futures UK

 

Join this year’s week of action to protest against austerity, fight for our rights and celebrate disabled people

 

From 29th August – 4th September DPAC and other campaigns will offer a range of activities you can get involved in. These events will bring together our anger at what is happening now, and celebrate our victories won, both in the past and to come.

 

 

Our rights are being stripped away day by day, by the neo-liberal policies being imposed on us all by the Condems, leaving us without much hope for our futures – or our children’s.

 

We have been here before. Our history is littered with examples of how our community has come together when under attack to fight – and win. From the early campaigns of NLBDP (National League of Blind and Disabled People) through to the founding and manifesto of UPIAS (Union of

 

the Physically Impaired Against Segregation) and on to DAN (Direct Action Network)- Now we have DPAC leading direct action and a host of other key grass root campaigns working towards reclaiming our rights and futures.

 

We have fought our corner over 3 centuries. And those fights have brought victories; the Independent Living Movement, our early CILs (Centres for Independent Living) and early active DPO’s (Disabled Peoples Organisations) and the significant rights for disabled people (which are now under attack). They represent big victories, brought about by mobilizing in our communities around our common cause – and having the will and determination to see our demands met without compromising our rights. We have consistently united in anger and celebration.

  

Download easy read information about the week here:

DPAC easy read (2)

 

DPAC Reclaiming our Futures Action

 

This autumn, we are asking our community to come together in anger, and celebration again – and to unite around our demands

 

We will be launching the UK Disabled People’s Manifesto setting out our vision of how the resources, structures and institutions of our society today can be re-designed to empower disabled people to take part in life on our terms. Disabled people are, and always will be, the experts on our lives and our self-determination. It will be a vision and practical plan that we can take forward in our communities, workplaces and lives to reclaim our futures.

 

In the build up to the manifesto launch, DPAC is leading The ‘Reclaiming Our Futures’, seven days of action to protest against the targeting of disabled people by austerity measures, to fight for our rights for inclusion and independence as equal citizens and to celebrate the value, pride and self determination of disabled people.

 

From 29th August – 4th September DPAC and other campaigns will offer a range of activities you can get involved in. These events will bring together our anger at what is happening now, and celebrate our victories won, both in the past and to come.

 

The plan below is only half the story. We want YOU, your Deaf and Disabled People’s Organisation, your campaign group, your community, your friends to put on events and get involved too. Can’t get to our exhibition? – then put on your own. Can’t get to our direct action? – then do your own. Barbecues, debates, quiz nights, family days, picnics – whatever! ACT – in celebration or in anger! (PS don’t forget to let us know what you’re doing).

 

 

Day by Day: 29th August-4th September

 

 

Thursday 29th August – YOU launch our 7 days of action

 

A range of resources will be available for your use as we ask all supporters to start our week of action with an online blitz. You will be the ones creating the buzz and the hype sending letters and twitter messages to targets of your choice ranging from MPs to disability charities to the media. We will be producing twibbons and memes but make and circulate your own. If you haven’t got a Social Media account (such as Facebook & Twitter) set one up now, link to DPAC ( twitter: @Dis_PPL_Protest) and let’s create a cyber wave. #dpacrof

 

The launch will coincide with Transport for All’s Day of Action to make CrossRail accessible: https://dpac.uk.net/2013/07/day-of-action-to-make-crossrail-fully-accessible-thursday-29th-august-2013/

 

 

 

Friday 30th August – Local Protests

 

Last year during the ATOS Games over 30 local actions took place around the UK Local actions mean you get to choose the target of your choice. You could take the Reclaiming Our Futures manifesto to present at your local MP’s constituency office, spread it through social media, protest on the streets against segregated education, the proposed ILF closure or show solidarity at your local Remploy site (for those few factories in their last weeks of operation). Alternatively, you might want to lobby your local Council on the Bedroom Tax and cuts to local services/support. Oh, and as we know ATOS offices are still around too….we’re sure you have other great ideas to add… Remember to let us know what you are doing so we can promote your actions. We will be producing local action resource packs but any materials you develop please send us copies to share with other protests and online.

 

 

Saturday 31st – Disability, Art & Protest Exhibition and Fundraising Gig

 

An exhibition and sharing of work exploring disability, art and protest followed by a ticketed fundraising gig run in partnership with Madpride and Tottenham Chances. Come during the day and join in our banner making workshop to prepare for the big Freedom Drive on the 4th September. If you would like to nominate an artist, collective and/or piece of work please let us know (including any links) and we will try to get them involved. If you want to do a local, street or online art protest too-this could be the day to do it.

 

Venue: Tottenham Chances, 399 High Road, London, N17 6QN Times:

 

12 – 7pm Exhibition: disability, art and protest

1 – 3.30pm Banner and placard making workshop

 

4 – 6pm Work Sharing

7.30pm till late Gig

 

 

Sunday 1st September – Reclaiming the Social Model: the social model in the 21st Century

 

Anne Rae: former UPIAS and current chair of the Greater

Manchester Coalition of Disabled People (GMCDP),

 

Colin Barnes: Professor of Disability Studies at Leeds Centre for Disability Studies

 

 

As government and the private sector increasingly use a so-called ‘modern understanding of disability’ to redefine who is and who isn’t disabled it is more important than ever that we understand, defend and promote the social model of disability. This isn’t helped when the social model is not fully supported within our movement. This event will be a chance to hear from a range of speakers and to discuss why the social model is still relevant today to our lives and our futures and to map out what we need to do to fight for it. The event will be live-streamed with the opportunity for people to participate in the discussion virtually. We will also be promoting a range of resources around the social model.

 

Venue

UNITE House, 128 Theobald’s Road, Holborn, WC1X 8TN

Time: 12.30 – 4.30pm

 

 

Monday 2nd September – Direct Action

 

Despite the huge efforts of thousands of disabled people throughout the country, it is increasingly difficult to find spaces where lies, inaccuracies and mis-use of statistics can be challenged. DPAC recently released a study into how the DWP uses all of these to vilify and demonize disabled people.

 

See more at: https://dpac.uk.net/2013/06/lies-damn-ids-and-statistics/#sthash.MAk5nTiU.dpuf

 

But why is this down to us? People should be presented with both sides of the story and this isn’t happening. Disabled people are having to find ways to make sure our truths will be heard. Watch this space…

 

 

Tuesday 3rd September – ‘I Dare’ day

 

A day of online action to reinforce that we want ‘Rights not Charity’, and a society where we are able to operate on our own terms as disabled people. Dare to ask for Rights not Charity. Dare to be an activist. Dare to ask more of ‘our’ organisations. We aren’t asking for Care, we want Power: Power to write the script for our own lives, and not to be written out or written off by others. A range of actions and captions will be available for you to capture in an image and circulate online.

 

 

Wednesday 4th September – UK FREEDOM DRIVE

 

A final-day march and events in and around Parliament. Four

 

themed ‘blocks’ will meet at 4 Government departments, central to the lives of disabled people. After handing over our demands, blocks will then move towards Parliament for a lobby where we will formally launch the UK Disabled People’s Manifesto and present our demands to our

 

elected representatives.

 

Choose your ‘block’ and meet at 12.45pm at one of:

 

·        Department for Education to oppose government attacks on inclusive education and a return to segregation (Sanctuary Buildings, 20 Great Smith Street, London, SW1P 3BT)

 

·        Department of Energy and Climate Change if you’re angry about the numbers of disabled people living in fuel poverty while the energy companies rake in ever growing profits (3 Whitehall Pl, City of Westminster, SW1A 2AW)

 

·        Department for Transport to challenge inaccessible transport, the opening of new inaccessible stations for Crossrail and proposed cuts to rail staff further reducing customer assistance (Great Minster House, 33 Horseferry Rd, London SW1P 4DR)

 

·        Department of Health to defend our NHS and demand our right to levels of social care support enabling choice, control, dignity and independence (Richmond House, 79 Whitehall, London SW1A 2NS)

 

Lobby of Parliament: 5 – 6pm – launch of the UK Disabled People’s

Manifesto

 

WE WANT EVERYBODY TO JOIN US FOR THE FREEDOM DRIVE ideally in person, but also online-this is for everyone everywhere. There will be accessible transport from a variety of towns and cities throughout the country (details to follow) and there is some funding available for transport but we will need your co-operation and patience to make this work for everybody, so please bear with us and note that while DPAC members will be given priority we want to support as many people as we can. If you can’t get there send a photo or your name and you can march with us.

 

This week of action is yours. Please take part at whatever level suits you – BUT MAKE SURE YOU TAKE PART. Share our events, resources and actions as far and wide as you can.

 

 

 

Let’s Reclaim Our Futures, together!

 

 

DPAC web site: www.dpac.uk.net

 

DPAC facebook:

 

https://www.facebook.com/pages/DPAC-Disabled-People-Against-Cuts/213545112011414?fref=ts(Open Community group- including allupdates from DPAC)

 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/DPAC2011/?fref=ts(original open groupDPAC page- faster paced and more opinion driven than community group )

 

DPAC Twitter: @Dis_PPL_Protest 

 

DPAC email: mail@dpac.uk.net

 

 

Remember if you need help with funding to get to London (4th Sept) email us at mail@dpac.uk.net with details. DPAC members will get first priority but we’re hoping to be able to contribute to all that want to come along. If you are unable to come but would like your picture carried send us a photo or message. Please get in touch with any other queries as well and we’ll try to help.

Download this as a PDF Doc: https://dpac.uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Reclaiming-Our-Futures-call-out-long-w-logos-v2.pdf

 Download this as a Word Doc: https://dpac.uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Reclaiming-Our-Futures-call-out-long-w-logos-v2-1.doc

 

 Reclaiming our Futures is supported by The Edge Fund, Andrew Wainwright Reform Trust, Network for Social Change, Black Triangle, Mental Health resistance network, Wow Petition, Fuel Poverty Action, Occupy London, TUC, UK UNCUT, Boycott Workfare, Right to Work, Just Fair, Unite Disabled Workers, BFAAWU, European Network on Independent Living, Anti-Bedroom Tax and Benefits Justice Federation, and more…..

 rof8

Aug 052013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

Hoban-Expenses-235x300

Last month (12 June), Mark Hoban said this during a debate on people’s right to ask for a recording of their employment and support allowance face-to-face assessments: https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm130612/debtext/130612-0004.htm#13061288000001

 

“The Department and Atos are in the process of amending written communications to claimants by updating the WCA AL1C form. The document is sent to claimants when they need to arrange a face-to-face assessment and will provide more information on how to arrange an audio-recorded assessment. We expect the revised form to be sent out to claimants by the end of next month, once the necessary changes have been made and the form has been cleared for use.” 

In other words – the DWP was finally going to change the documents it sends to ESA claimants to let them know that they can ask to have their Atos face-to-face assessments recorded. It’s vital that people know they have that right, because with a recording, they are able to demonstrate beyond doubt what was said and what happened at their assessments.

By “the end of next month,” Hoban surely meant the end of July – and we’ve just gone past that deadline.

 

Jayne Linney, DPAC, Black Triangle, False Economy and Public Interest Lawyers  (who, with disabled man Patrick Lynch, took a legal action against the DWP last year on people’s right to record their assessments https://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/dec/13/disabled-man-government-court-benefit-test ) are publishing this blog and asking you to reblog and share it to find out if the DWP has changed the documents it sends out to ESA claimants and if people have noted that. Earlier this month, the DWP sent Public Interest Lawyers this document as an example of the leaflet that claimants should receive about their face-to-face assessments. This document includes information which advises people of their right to ask for a recording. We want to know whether people are getting that document and if word is spreading that people can make that request.

 

This is important for a number of reasons. The first is, of course, that people need to know they have this right and that they can request a recording when they are called to an Atos ESA face-to-face assessment. The second is that Hoban claims that he is evaluating the demand for recordings and that he’ll be doing so until the end of summer 2013. (It will be important for people to respond to these blogs as soon as possible – by the end of August 2013 at the very latest – that being the case). https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm130612/debtext/130612-0004.htm#13061288000001

 Hoban continues to argue that the demand for recordings is not high. Campaigners have argued, rightly, that their surveys https://dpac.uk.net/2012/11/dpac-survey-responses-on-wca-what-harrington-didnt-ask/

 and calls for information show that people do want recordings – and that demand may well increase if people actually know that they can ask for a recording. Unfortunately – or intentionally – Hoban says that the evaluation of demand will finish at the end of summer. That isn’t far away and doesn’t give anybody much time to find out if the amended documentation (presuming that people are receiving it) is having an effect. The third reason that this is important is that the DWP says it has based its decision NOT to offer recordings for Personal Independence Payment assessments on the ESA experience: “the DWP has not seen evidence from other disability assessments that this would improve the quality of assessments,” Esther McVey told parliament this year. So evidence of the demand for ESA recordings is very relevant to the PIP debate. https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm130418/text/130418w0003.htm#13041838000125  The department’s whole approach to recording PIP assessments is a mess – Capita, which has a contract to carry out some of the PIP assessments, originally said it would offer recordings. McVey put a stop to that and said that it wouldn’t. Meanwhile, the DWP was telling journalists that recordings would be offered for PIP assessments.  https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/07/secret-cuts-part-four-personal-independence-payments They’re making it up as they go along, so pressure needs to be applied.

 

The aim should be to get rid of the work capability assessment altogether – but while it’s there, safeguards like recordings of assessments need to be in place. Claimants and campaigners have fought hard for the right to record their face-to-face assessments. As we’ve said, people need to be able to demonstrate beyond doubt what is said at assessments. Atos is notorious for returning fit-for-work reports which ignore a claimant’s true circumstances and the details shared in face-to-face assessments. The ever-increasing number of ESA appeals  https://mikesivier.wordpress.com/2013/06/28/esa-appeals-more-than-double-and-decisions-in-the-claimants-favour-are-increasing/ prove Atos’ problems with accuracy.

https://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/dec/13/disabled-man-government-court-benefit-test

Campaigners have won some concessions through their hard work. These include a commitment from the DWP to offer ESA assessment recordings (on “official” dual-CD recording equipment – people still can’t bring their own recording equipment unless it can dual-produce a CD or cassette). The changed paperwork was another concession. Let’s see if they’ve done it and if people are aware of it.

Download DWP Notes Sheet on assessment

https://dpac.uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/WCAAL1C_0713-21.pdf

 

 

 

 

Aug 032013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

DPAC and Black Triangle condemn the misguided, insensitive and inflammatory comments of Dr Phil Peverley. We also want to condemn the pitch and severity of the pieces in the Mail and Telegraph (2nd August) framing Peverley’s comments, as a further outrageous abuse of the facts and issues affecting disabled people and those with diagnosed long term health issues.

 

Peverley’s words are an insult to all those that suffer the misery and anxiety of Atos within the regime designed to remove support from disabled people. His words are an insult to those that have died shortly after being declared ‘fit for work’ or before an appeal which found that, once again, Atos were wrong-something that happens with increasing regularly in a system that is chaotic and unworkable.

 

Those people may also have been within the so-called ‘proportion of punters’ that Peverley claims ‘are hell-bent on trying to prove they’re really ill, and need us [GPS] to confirm it’ or maybe they were some of the perceived ‘disgruntled unworking well’ who are ‘full of indignation at being considered reasonably healthy.’ The Department of Works and Pensions DWP own figures show deaths within 6 weeks of tests were at over 10,000. The DWP are refusing to publish up –to date statistics, so we would guess that these figures have risen significantly.

Thanks to the tireless efforts of Black Triangle on the 28th June 2012 the British Medical Association (BMA) supported a call to demand that the WCA should be ended ‘with immediate effect and be replaced with a rigorous and safe system that does not cause unavoidable harm.’ Peverley on the other hand thinks Atos are doing a great job -despite new evidence everyday that they clearly are not, despite MPs, journalists, and the public accounts committee condemnation of their conduct and the multi-million Atos contract. (See Dr McCartney’s piece in the British Medical Journal and Black Triangles’ 2013 letter of support from Drs and MPS)

 

Remarkably, Peverley declared that he considered putting a picture of Stephen Hawkings in his surgery with the caption: ‘This bloke is not on the sick!’ The comparison of Hawkings to every single disabled person is beyond bizarre. This is a man with the funds to ensure a network of P.A. support, home adaptations and technical aids- something far out of the reach of the majority of disabled people –where even a basic level of support is becoming increasingly unlikely in the current slash and burn climate. Hawkings won’t miss his ILF payments if the appeal hearing against the DWP doesn’t produce the correct verdict. Hawkings won’t need to worry about local authority cuts or the tsunami of other cuts, caps, punitive costs, sanctions and penalties being imposed on disabled people and other low income people by this Government.

 In Sept 2012 the BMA also said that GPs workloads had massively increased due to the chaotic system of the WCA and increasing numbers of appeals. Peverley also says: ‘’These fitness-to-work assessments – under Atos, and under anyone who takes the role for that matter – generate a massive amount of work in general practice’ in his column in the Pulse. However, neither the Mail nor the Telegraph wanted to pick up on the increased workloads the Atos/WCA system is causing for GPs.  None wanted to mention that people can now be charged up to 200 pounds for GP reports, to support them in an assessment, or that GPs increasingly refuse to supply reports either.- a further hurdle for disabled people and those with debilitating long term health issues in the attempt to gain the support they need in the punitive assessment process.

 The Mail and Telegraph both carried the comments of Peverley. True- they’re both right wing newspapers and tools of Tory propaganda. Yet, the pitch and severity of both pieces in framing Peverley’s comments was a clear abuse of the facts and issues facing disabled people; as are Peverly’s inflammatory comments.

The Telegraph carried the headline: ‘A GP incensed at his surgeries being full of the “disgruntled unworking well” has said he considered displaying a poster of Professor Stephen Hawking along with the caption: “This bloke is not on the sick”’.

While the Mail went that bit further with the more loaded headline:  ‘THIS bloke is not on the sick! Angry GP cites Hawking to shame hordes of patients asking him to sign them off’.

Peverley’s original Pulse piece fits the welfare ‘reform’ agenda perfectly. An agenda that incorporates the right wing media and Governments constant demonising of disabled people as feckless/workshy/scroungers  – Peverley’s original rallying cry in the Pulse was that he did not want to sign ‘sick notes. The piece headlined: ‘Save me from the unworking wellwas posted on the 29th July. Neither the Mail nor the Telegraph showed the same eagerness to publish his jaunty column of 25th April ‘A Curious Case of Missing Sick Notes’ which talks about the constant losing of sick notes by the DWP. But why would they?

Peverley has played into their hands, not only does he appear to support the discredited bio -psychosocial model, beloved of Aylward and Freud, that removes GPs and replaces them with private companies paid with huge amounts of public money- he has given them the final piece of the puzzle –privatise the sick note and remove it from any element of medical evidence. Let’s have 100% ‘fit to work’ even if a 100% drop dead in the process. Those that can afford it, like Hawkings can buy their own private back-up plan’.

In the meantime Peverley has been reported to the GMC. Twitter @gmcuk

There is a facebook campaign group at facebook.com/permalink.php?…

Peverley is on twitter @PhilPeverley

His surgery address for letters is at the link below-please do not use the surgery telephone lines!

Dr Phil Peverley 

Old Forge Surgery
Pallion Park
Pallion
Sunderland, SR4 6QE

 To Protest against this and the other attacks on disabled people join DPAC’s 7 days of Action https://dpac.uk.net/2013/07/reclaiming-our-futures-7-days-of-action/

DPAC twitter: @dis_ppl_protest

Black Triangle twitter: @blacktriangle1

 

Jul 262013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

La société Atos Healthcare, filiale d’Atos Origin est chargée par le gouvernement Britannique d’effectuer des contrôles auprès des bénéficiaires d’allocations handicap, dans le but avoué de réduire de 20% ce poste budgétaire au Royaume Uni, tandis que le gouvernement mène sans relâche une campagne de diabolisation des personnes handicapées,  traitées en parasites de la société.

Ces contrôles humiliants auxquels doivent se soumettre les personnes handicapées  ont été condamnés par l’Ordre des Médecins britannique, le RCN qui représente les infirmiers et infirmières dans tout le Royaume Uni , les associations de personnes handicapées; ils ont fait l’objet de multiples débats à la Chambre des députés;  le rapport du Comité des comptes de l’état a également  vigoureusement critiqué les termes du contrat passé avec Atos qui coûte une fortune au contribuable britannique et dernièrement un médecin travaillant pour Atos a démissionné, révélant à la BBC que les dés étaient pipés, que les évaluateurs des capacités au travail, qui utilisent un système de points, se voyaient fixer des objectifs préétablis de radiation, avant même d’effectuer ces contrôles, comme l’ont révélé deux reportages télévisés et que les personnes handicapées étaient injustement privées de leurs allocations, et de ressources financières.

Mais le gouvernement Britannique continue toujours à faire la chasse aux personnes handicapées et à refuser de révéler combien d’entre elles sont décédées après avoir fait appel mais avant qu’un jugement soit rendu, certaines devant attendre parfois plus d’un an pour cela. 1,3 millions de personnes ont fait appel en trois ans, et les statistiques du Ministère de la Justice révèle qu’environ 43% d’entre elles gagnent leur procès. Ce chiffre atteint 80% lorsqu’elles sont représentées par un avocat.   Alors qu’Atos se défend en disant que la décision finale concernant le droit d’une personne handicapée à des allocations handicap est prise par un fonctionnaire sans qualification médicale du Ministère du travail, toujours est-il que les recommandations d’Atos sont suivies à plus de 90%.

Mais derrière les chiffres, se cachent des milliers de tragédies humaines.

Pour reprendre les termes de la médaillée d’or aux Jeux paralympiques Tara Flood, « le scandaleux paradoxe est que le principal sponsor de Londres 2012 [ait étéAtos, celui-là même qui détruit la vie des plus vulnérables pour le compte de l’État ».

Pour de plus amples informations :

https://www.courrierinternational.com/article/2012/09/04/la-vitrine-doree-d-une-politique-honteuse-envers-les-handicapes

 https://www.bastamag.net/article2608.html

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22546036

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/9590852/Botched-tests-deny-the-disabled-their-benefits.html

https://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jan/04/disability-claimants-work-assessments-atos

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/atos-told-incontinent-woman-to-wear-nappy-firm-condemned-by-mps-for-pressuring-sick-and-disabled-into-returning-to-work-8456447.html

https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmpubacc/744/744.pdf

https://atos.net/fr-fr/accueil/nous-sommes/newsroom/communique-de-presse/2013/pr-2013_07_17_01.html

 

Disabled people are furious that Atos has again been appointed Official IT partner of the International Paralympics Committee Athletics World Championships in Lyon

 

Atos Healthcare, a branch of Atos Origin, holds the British government contract to assess disabled people’s entitlement to disability benefits, with the stated goal of a 20% reduction in costs.

 The humiliating assessments disabled people are subjected to have been condemned by the BMA, the RCN and many other official organisations and bodies which have called for them to be scrapped; there have been numerous debates in the Houses of Parliament about the way Atos carries out assessments; the Public Accounts Committee found that the British public was not getting value for money with the Atos contract. And lately an Atos whistle blower doctor explained to the BBC how the assessments, using a tickbox point scoring questionnaire, deliberately fail disabled people in order to stop their benefits. Two television programmes have also revealed that Atos assessors were given targets as to the number of claimants who should be entitled to disability benefits. 

The British government still refuses to release figures about the number of disabled people who have died while waiting for the outcome of their appeals. Over 1.3 million people have appealed in 3 years, of which, according to Ministry of Justice figures, 43% won their appeals, rising to 80% if they had legal representation. Although Atos’ answer to its critics is to say that the final decision is taken by an employee of the DWP without a medical background, over 90% of Atos recommendations are upheld. 

But behind the figures, a human tragedy is unfolding

As gold medal-winning Paralympian Tara Flood puts it: “It is a shocking irony that Atos is a main sponsor of London (Olympic) 2012 while destroying disabled people’s lives on behalf of the governmen

Jul 242013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

After news that GPs are now being told not to supply evidence for ESA or want to charge people a small fortune to do the job of a GP for writing reports –more tricks from the DWP to get claimant numbers down and trick people out of their entitlement from Disability Sanctuary which we are reposting. They say:

“DWP are stopping sending out warnings that GP fit notes (sick notes) are running out in most areas, you wont know until your payments stop and you ring them. This has been the case in some areas already for a while now, but we have been told today that its something that they are stopping altogether this month. So keep a check on when your note runs out, and when you send one, ensure you check with them to make sure they have received a new note, or better still get an appointment to have it scanned onto the local Job Centre system so it goes live straight away (well almost.)

If posting you must send the note to the centre dealing with your claim, if in doubt then check with them via phone as if it goes to the wrong one they do not always forward them, (no surprises there!)”

With thanks to Disability Sanctuary  

https://www.disabilitysanctuary.com/forum/index.php?threads/warning-to-those-in-wrag-work-related-activity-group-of-esa.9081/

and thanks to Annie who spotted this

 

Jul 222013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

But will any ‘improvement’ plan be
just another whitewash?

Of course it will.

Government is just oh so predictable.  People will no doubt be jumping with joy over today’s ministerial statement that Atos is at long last going to be subjected to having to put in place an improvement plan.  You’ve only got to read the small print before you see how yet another corporate global giant will be offering Atos some ‘independent advice’ as to how to go about making the much needed improvements.

The DWP has engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers “to provide independent advice in relation to strengthening quality assurance processes across all its health and disability assessments. In addition, and in the longer-term, increased provider capacity will ensure that a greater focus on quality can be achieved alongside enabling the number of assessments the Department requires to be delivered.”

Independent?

PricewaterhouseCoopers are no strangers to Atos as clarified by an excerpt from yet another Atos glossy leaflet entitled “e-invoicing – speed-up your process – take cost-cutting initiatives”; it’s hardly encouraging that the accent is on even more cost cutting.  The glossy goes on to highlight the close working relationship with Atos Worldline (another Atos derivative) and PWC:

“Atos Worldline studies European and worldwide constraints from a legal and fiscal point of view in collaboration with Price-waterhouse-Coopers Tax Consultants SCCRL office who is the leader studying rules to be applied to e-invoicing and e-archiving at international level. e-invoicing covers fiscal and legal prerequisites in more than 30 countries over the world” 

And as if you couldn’t guess there’s more controversy involving the question of donations to the Tory Party

“The Electoral Commission confirmed that, since Cameron
became Tory leader, PwC has made non-cash
donations worth £545,000 to the
Conservative party in

“staff” and “consultancy services”.

It seems PWC was also called in to sort out a probe in to the death of NHS patients at a cost of £2.7 million pounds according to an article in the Daily Mirror

No doubt PWC will leave aside the need for probing questions in to the deaths of benefit claimants following Atos’s infamous health assessments.

Await the whitewash and clean bill of health to appease the select committee; after which it’ll be business as usual.  Here’s Lord Freud’s ministerial statement:


Written Ministerial Statement

 

Monday 22 July 2013

 

THE DEPARTMENT FOR WORK AND PENSIONS

 

New providers to deliver Work Capability Assessments

The Minister for Welfare Reform (Lords) (Lord Freud): The Department for Work and Pensions is committed to continually reviewing and improving the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) process, to ensure that it is as responsive to the needs of claimants as possible. As part of this and to bring down waiting times for claimants, DWP has decided to change its approach to contracting for the WCA, by procuring additional providers on a regional basis. This is in keeping with the Department’s current commercial strategy and will provide increased capacity. These arrangements are likely to be operational from summer 2014.

The WCA process is currently subject to a system of quality assurance and audits by both Atos Healthcare and DWP. A recent DWP audit identified a reduction in the quality of written reports which are produced by Atos following assessments and are then used by the Department to form part of the decision making process on benefit entitlement. This is contractually unacceptable. The Department is considering all its options under the contract and will apply all appropriate contractual remedies to ensure quality and value.

Atos has been instructed by the Department to immediately enact a quality improvement plan. Measures include retraining and re-evaluating all Atos healthcare professionals, with those not meeting the required standard of written reporting either remaining subject to 100% audit until compliant or having their approval to carry out assessments revoked by the Department.

The Department has also engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers to provide independent advice in relation to strengthening quality assurance processes across all its health and disability assessments. In addition, and in the longer-term, increased provider capacity will ensure that a greater focus on quality can be achieved alongside enabling the number of assessments the Department requires to be delivered.

Assessment reports, such as those provided by Atos, form only one part of the WCA process, which has a number of checks and balances built in to ensure the right decision is reached for claimants. After the Atos assessment DWP Decision Makers make the final decision on claimants’ benefit entitlement based on all evidence provided during the claim. If the claimant disputes the decision or appeals there is then a reconsideration process where another DWP Decision Maker will reconsider the decision. If the claimant is still unhappy about the decision made, they can appeal. It is important to stress that DWP’s audit activity showed that claimants whose reports did not meet our rigorous quality standard were no more or less likely to have been found fit for work or appeal against the Department’s decision than other claimants.

The Department also remains committed to the ongoing process of annual independent reviews of the WCA. From the three reviews already carried out by Professor Malcolm Harrington, over 50 recommendations have been, or are being, implemented to ensure the WCA is as fair and as accurate as possible. For example, we are currently carrying out an evidence-based review of the WCA descriptors with a number of major charities and we are working closely with the First-tier Tribunal to better understand the reasons for upheld appeals.

A further independent review of the WCA is currently being undertaken by Dr Paul Litchfield, a respected Senior Occupational Physician, and we expect Dr Litchfield to make recommendations before the end of the year to further strengthen the WCA.

The above measures show our commitment to continually improve the assessment, and to take decisive action when it becomes clear that there are issues which need addressing. We will come back to Parliament in the autumn with a further update.

A million thanks to the fantastic Nick at My legal Forum

Follow Nick on twitter: @Mylegalforum

See more here: https://ilegal.org.uk/thread/7790/atos-job?page=1&scrollTo=20067

 

 

Jul 162013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

DPAC Logo 3 amendment 1 (Small)Our rights are being stripped away day by day by the neo-liberal policies being imposed on us all by the Condems leaving us without any hope for our futures or our children’s futures.

 

DPAC say this is not fair, not acceptable and we must fight back against the continuing attacks. We will be having a week of actions nationally and virtually from August 29th and culminating on September 4th with  mass events and actions in London.

 

Thursday 29th August – launch on anniversary of coffin delivery to Atos, make Crossrail fully accessible protest, plus more….

 

Friday 30th August – local protests –go to local MPs, Atos offices, schools and colleges that are creating barriers to inclusion..plus more…

 

Saturday 31st August – disability, art and protest exhibition and gig

 

Sunday 1st September –
The Social Model In The 21st Century – Why Is It Still relevant?

 

Monday 2nd September – Media direct actions, picking up the pace as we come to the end of the week of action, despite everything we do it is getting more and more difficult to get media space to present the facts whereas there is plenty of space given to misrepresentation of stats and government lies

 

Tuesday 3rd September – ‘I Dare’ day – to reinforce that we want Rights not Charity and a society where we are able to operate on our own terms as disabled people.

Approximate time 1pm -2.30pm

 

Wednesday 4th September – Grand Finale events in London and public launch of the Manifesto ‘Reclaiming our Futures’

noon- 4pm followed by lobby of parliament 5-6pm

 

We want to get disabled people from around the UK out resisting, based on their experiences, creating disabled people’s space, raising awareness of what we are all about. But there is plenty of social media stuff too- everyone can be an ‘extremist’!

 

The Anti Atos message last year was very clear and very successful. This year we want the messaging to be broader and to be about what we want and expect from any future government including all aspects of inclusion.

 

At the Rethinking Disability Policy event last September a network of Disabled People’s Organisations agreed to develop a manifesto of demands. The manifesto is nearly ready for consultation and sign up. Let us know if you’d like a copy.

 

The Reclaiming Our Futures week will launch the manifesto and say what we want to protect our futures.

 

Last year’s ATOS GAMES protests had at least 33 separate local protests in different locations in England, Scotland and Wales over the course of the week.

 

While the Atos Games focused on demonstrating and closing things down, this year’s week of action will retain that anger and include direct action but it will also be a celebration of disability pride.

 

DPAC has some funding for the week of action and we have worked out what we have the capacity to do. We are asking other groups to think about what they can put on and contribute to the week. This needs all of us!

 

We are asking people around the UK to do things as well – debates, forums, art exhibitions, protests, to link in with this. Let us know what you’re planning and we’ll publicise it!

 

If you need help with funding to get to London (4th Sept) email us at mail@dpac.uk.net with details. DPAC members will get first priority but we’re hoping to be able to contribute to all that want to come along. If you are unable to come but would like your picture carried send us a photo or message. Please get in touch with any other queries as well and we’ll try to help.

more to come…….

Jul 152013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

We are reposting our list of advice and legal resources with some additions- please contact us if you know of others that would be useful to add or any that are no longer working because of this Government’s cuts to legal aid

DPAC receive a large number of requests for advice and information on cuts and the WCA . We cannot give advice, but direct to web resources that we know.

We also have a DPAC Facebook page which includes many people struggling with issues of ESA, Atos assessments and DWP failures –it acts as an advice forum from those that may have been through the issues you might be experiencing it’s at https://www.facebook.com/groups/DPAC2011/418279398228320/?notif_t=group_activity

Useful web sites

https://www.advicenow.org.uk/

https://www.advicenow.org.uk/advicenow-guides/problems-with-benefits/turned-down-for-dla-aa-pip-think-youre-not-getting-enough/

www.benefitsandwork.co.uk

https://edinburghagainstpoverty.org.uk/

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/

https://www.citizensadvice.co.uk/en/  Northern Ireland

https://www.cas.org.uk/cta/find-your-local-cab Scotland

https://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Diol1/DoItOnline/DoItOnlineByCategory/DG_067277 Find your local CAB

https://www.turn2us.org.uk/information__resources/benefits/social_fund/short_term_benefit_advances.aspx

https://budgetingadvance.com/

WCA: how to prepare

https://www.socialworkfuture.org/articles-and-analysis/articles/242-survival-tips-for-the-work-capability-assessment

https://antp.org.uk/wcarules.htm

WCA Appeals: what you need to do

https://www.solfed.org.uk/?q=unwaged-workers/know-your-rights-failing-a-work-capability-assessment

Debt

National Debtline

Free and independent advice on debt

Telephone: 0808 808 4000 (Monday-Friday, 9am -9pm; Saturday, 9.30am-1pm)

Website: www.nationaldebtline.co.uk

Benefits/hardship payments/Short term Budgeting loans

DPAC: https://dpac.uk.net/2013/05/hardship-paymentsbudgeting-loans-and-short-term-advances

Homelessness

Shelter

A national telephone advice line staffed by trained housing advisers.
Telephone: 0808 800 4444 (8am-8pm Monday-Friday, 8am-5pm Saturday-Sunday)

Websites: https://england.shelter.org.uk and https://scotland.shelter.org.uk

Homeless UK

This has an online database search allows you to search, by area, for organisations providing benefits and debt advice.

Website: www.homelessuk.org

DIAL

There are around 120 local Disability Information and Advice Line services (DIALs) run by disabled people and now taken over by the SCOPE charity

For area coverage see: www.scope.org.uk/services/local-groups/dial-uk.

Part 2

Free legal assistance list with thanks to Inclusion London

Bar Pro Bono Unit

Who are they?

A charity that helps to find pro bono legal assistance from volunteer barristers for individuals and organisations who cannot afford to pay and who cannot obtain public funding (legal aid).

What do they do?

The Unit matches barristers prepared to undertake pro bono work with those who need their help. The office itself does not give advice.

The volunteer barristers can provide advice, representation and help at mediation; representation in any court/tribunal; give legal advice on any subject; and draft documents such as skeleton arguments.

How do you access the service?

  • They cannot accept applications unless they come via a referrer (generally, an advice agency such as the CAB or a Law Centre, or a local MP)
  • Visit the website www.barprobono.org.uk
  • For more information if you are an individual needing help Click Here
  • Submit a query via contact form Click Here

Community Legal Advice

Who are they?

A free and confidential advice service in England and Wales paid for by legal aid.

What do they do?

Provide free help or legal advice over the phone. They can help with family, debt, housing, employment, education, welfare benefits and tax credits problems.

They will check to see if you are eligible for legal aid and put you in touch with a specialist legal adviser, or refer you to other agencies of you do not qualify for their services.
Has a free translation service available in 170 languages.

How do you access the service?

  • Telephone 0845 345 4 345 (Open Monday to Friday 9.00 am to 8.00 pm. Saturday 9.00 am to 12.30 pm. Calls cost 4p per minute from a BT landline; cost from mobiles will be more)
  • Request a call back 

               -Via online form Click Here

               -Text ‘legalaid’ then your name to 80010 (Call back within 24 hours)

Disability Law Service (England and Wales only)

Who are they?

A national charity run by disabled people, which specialises in free legal advice and information for disabled people, their families and carers.

What do they do?

They provide free legal advice and representation (e.g. in complaints, using the Ombudsman, tribunals and courts), specialising in Welfare Benefits; Community Care; Disability Discrimination in Employment, Access to Goods and Services; and using the Equality Duty to challenge public authorities.
They run a free legal advice line, open Mon-Friday, 10am–5pm, with an answering machine service for out of hours calls.
They run an Employment Law drop in at their office in Tower Hamlets, where a member of their legal team will assess whether you are financially eligible for legal aid under the Legal Services Commissions (LSC) Legal Help scheme.
They also have factsheets available to download on key areas of the law, such as Community Care; education; employment; goods and services; and welfare benefits. The factsheets are available for download in different formats – regular, large print, text only and audio file.
They commit to responding to telephone enquiries within 24 hours, and written enquiries within 7-10 days.

How do you access the service?

Free Representation Unit (FRU)

Who are they?

A charity that provides free legal representation for the public and advocacy experience for junior lawyers.

What do they do?

Provide legal advice, case preparation and advocacy in employment tribunals (and appeals from decisions of the employment tribunals); social security appeals in the first-tier tribunal (and appeals from such decisions); and criminal injury compensation cases.

How do you access the service?

  • *Do not accept cases directly from members of the public – all cases must come through a referral agency. For a list of referral agencies, Click Here
  • Visit the website www.thefru.org.uk

LawWorks

Who are they?

A charity that works with law firms and legal professionals to involve them in delivering pro bono work.

What do they do?

Aim to provide free legal help to those who cannot afford to pay for it and who are unable to access legal aid.

Services to individuals include free Legal Advice Clinics, free mediation to settle disputes out of court, and free casework assistance if you need more than one-off advice.

Who are they for?

Individuals

How do you access the service?

ProBonoUK.net

Who are they?

A charity that run a website for the promotion of pro bono legal work.

What do they do?

Act as a resource for news andinformation about pro bono work for individuals, advice workers and lawyers wishing to offer help.

How do you access the service?

RAD Legal Services:   BSL

Who are they?

A dedicated legal advice service for Deaf BSL users provided by the Royal Association of Deaf People (RAD).

What do they do?

RAD Legal Services currently has three projects: a Discrimination Advice project, a Webcam Advice Project and a Money Advice Service project.
Discrimination Advice gives free specialist legal advice on discrimination issues in the areas of employment, housing, education and goods, facilities and services.  This is provided by a Deaf solicitor, and can be delivered face to face, via webcam, email, telephone or instant messaging software.
Webcam Advice is the BSL version of the Community Legal Advice Helpline, and is available free of charge to people eligible for legal aid in the areas of welfare benefits, debt, housing and employment.  As well as webcam, they can also provide advice via instant messaging software such as Windows Live Messenger, ooVoo, etc.
Money Advice Service has a qualified Money Adviser giving free, clear and ‘jargon-free’ Money Advice money advice to D/deaf and hard of hearing people who live in the South East. The Service covers the savings and investments; borrowings (credit cards, loans and mortgages); retirement planning and pensions; redundancy; tax and tax credits; insurance; debt; starting a family; and budgeting.

How do you access the service?

Other links

Advice Guide

Citizen’s Advice Bureau (CAB) online advice resource.
www.adviceguide.org.uk

Citizen’s Advice Bureau (CAB)

The website of the national advice agency, including Search for your nearest CAB.
www.citizensadvice.org.uk

Law Centres Federation

The umbrella organisation that supports and promotes UK Law Centres. For a list of London’s Law Centres, visit
www.lawcentres.org.uk/directory/location/London

Legal Adviser Finder

Find legal advisers or solicitors near you
https://legaladviserfinder.justice.gov.uk/AdviserSearch.do

back to top

Download the list of Legal firms: Public Law Specialists

Download list of Legal Firms: Community Care specialists

 

 

 

 

Jul 112013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

There are few surprises here, but we made a little list-with thanks to Hampshire DPAC

See also full text from yesterdays 10th July debate: https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm130710/debtext/130710-0002.htm#13071070000001

Need to scroll half way down page to heading ‘opposition day: disabled people’

And letter to Guardian: https://m.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jul/09/debate-on-disability-pat-petition

How they voted: cumulative impact assessment on the effects of cuts on disabled people

The House divided: Ayes 227, Noes 296.

AYES

    Abbott, Ms Diane

    Abrahams, Debbie

    Ainsworth, rh Mr Bob

    Alexander, rh Mr Douglas

    Alexander, Heidi

    Ali, Rushanara

    Allen, Mr Graham

    Anderson, Mr David

    Ashworth, Jonathan

    Austin, Ian

    Bailey, Mr Adrian

    Bain, Mr William

    Balls, rh Ed

    Banks, Gordon

    Barron, rh Mr Kevin

    Beckett, rh Margaret

    Begg, Dame Anne

    Benn, rh Hilary

    Benton, Mr Joe

    Berger, Luciana

    Betts, Mr Clive

    Blackman-Woods, Roberta

    Blears, rh Hazel

    Blenkinsop, Tom

    Blomfield, Paul

    Brennan, Kevin

    Brown, Lyn

    Brown, rh Mr Nicholas

    Brown, Mr Russell

    Bryant, Chris

    Buck, Ms Karen

    Burden, Richard

    Burnham, rh Andy

    Byrne, rh Mr Liam

    Campbell, Mr Alan

    Campbell, Mr Ronnie

    Caton, Martin

    Champion, Sarah

    Chapman, Jenny

    Clark, Katy

    Clarke, rh Mr Tom

    Clwyd, rh Ann

    Coaker, Vernon

    Coffey, Ann

    Connarty, Michael

    Cooper, Rosie

    Corbyn, Jeremy

    Crausby, Mr David

    Creasy, Stella

    Cruddas, Jon

    Cryer, John

    Cunningham, Alex

    Cunningham, Mr Jim

    Cunningham, Sir Tony

    Curran, Margaret

    Danczuk, Simon

    David, Wayne

    Davidson, Mr Ian

    Davies, Geraint

    De Piero, Gloria

    Denham, rh Mr John

    Dobbin, Jim

    Dobson, rh Frank

    Docherty, Thomas

    Doran, Mr Frank

    Doughty, Stephen

    Dowd, Jim

    Doyle, Gemma

    Dugher, Michael

    Eagle, Ms Angela

    Eagle, Maria

    Edwards, Jonathan

    Efford, Clive

    Ellman, Mrs Louise

    Engel, Natascha

    Esterson, Bill

    Evans, Chris

    Farrelly, Paul

    Fitzpatrick, Jim

    Flello, Robert

    Flint, rh Caroline

    Flynn, Paul

    Fovargue, Yvonne

    Francis, Dr Hywel

    Gapes, Mike

    Gardiner, Barry

    Gilmore, Sheila

    Glass, Pat

    Glindon, Mrs Mary

    Godsiff, Mr Roger

    Goggins, rh Paul

    Goodman, Helen

    Greatrex, Tom

    Green, Kate

    Greenwood, Lilian

    Griffith, Nia

    Gwynne, Andrew

    Hain, rh Mr Peter

    Hamilton, Fabian

    Hanson, rh Mr David

    Harman, rh Ms Harriet

    Harris, Mr Tom

    Healey, rh John

    Hermon, Lady

    Hilling, Julie

    Hoey, Kate

    Hood, Mr Jim

    Hopkins, Kelvin

    Hosie, Stewart

    Howarth, rh Mr George

    Irranca-Davies, Huw

    Jackson, Glenda

    Jamieson, Cathy

    Jarvis, Dan

    Johnson, rh Alan

    Johnson, Diana

    Jones, Graham

    Jones, Helen

    Jones, Mr Kevan

    Jowell, rh Dame Tessa

    Kaufman, rh Sir Gerald

    Kendall, Liz

    Lammy, rh Mr David

    Lavery, Ian

    Leslie, Chris

    Lewell-Buck, Mrs Emma

    Lewis, Mr Ivan

    Long, Naomi

    Love, Mr Andrew

    Lucas, Ian

    MacNeil, Mr Angus Brendan

    Mactaggart, Fiona

    Mahmood, Shabana

    Mann, John

    Marsden, Mr Gordon

    McCabe, Steve

    McCann, Mr Michael

    McCarthy, Kerry

    McClymont, Gregg

    McCrea, Dr William

    McDonagh, Siobhain

    McDonnell, Dr Alasdair

    McFadden, rh Mr Pat

    McGovern, Alison

    McGovern, Jim

    McGuire, rh Mrs Anne

    McKechin, Ann

    McKenzie, Mr Iain

    McKinnell, Catherine

    Meacher, rh Mr Michael

    Mearns, Ian

    Miller, Andrew

    Morden, Jessica

    Morrice, Graeme (Livingston)

    Morris, Grahame M. (Easington)

    Mudie, Mr George

    Munn, Meg

    Murphy, rh Mr Jim

    Murphy, rh Paul

    Murray, Ian

    Nandy, Lisa

    Nash, Pamela

    O’Donnell, Fiona

    Onwurah, Chi

    Osborne, Sandra

    Pearce, Teresa

    Perkins, Toby

    Phillipson, Bridget

    Pound, Stephen

    Qureshi, Yasmin

    Raynsford, rh Mr Nick

    Reed, Mr Jamie

    Reed, Mr Steve

    Reynolds, Emma

    Reynolds, Jonathan

    Riordan, Mrs Linda

    Robertson, Angus

    Robertson, John

    Robinson, Mr Geoffrey

    Rotheram, Steve

    Roy, Mr Frank

    Roy, Lindsay

    Ruane, Chris

    Ruddock, rh Dame Joan

    Sarwar, Anas

    Sawford, Andy

    Seabeck, Alison

    Shannon, Jim

    Sharma, Mr Virendra

    Sheerman, Mr Barry

    Sheridan, Jim

    Shuker, Gavin

    Skinner, Mr Dennis

    Slaughter, Mr Andy

    Smith, rh Mr Andrew

    Smith, Angela

    Smith, Nick

    Smith, Owen

    Spellar, rh Mr John

    Straw, rh Mr Jack

    Stuart, Ms Gisela

    Sutcliffe, Mr Gerry

    Tami, Mark

    Thornberry, Emily

    Timms, rh Stephen

    Trickett, Jon

    Turner, Karl

    Twigg, Derek

    Twigg, Stephen

    Umunna, Mr Chuka

    Vaz, rh Keith

    Vaz, Valerie

    Walley, Joan

    Watts, Mr Dave

    Weir, Mr Mike

    Whitehead, Dr Alan

    Williams, Hywel

    Williamson, Chris

    Wilson, Phil

    Wilson, Sammy

    Winnick, Mr David

    Winterton, rh Ms Rosie

    Wishart, Pete

    Wood, Mike

    Woodcock, John

    Wright, David

    Wright, Mr Iain

 

    Tellers for the Ayes:

    Nic Dakin and

    Susan Elan Jones

NOES

 

    Adams, Nigel

    Afriyie, Adam

    Aldous, Peter

    Amess, Mr David

    Andrew, Stuart

    Arbuthnot, rh Mr James

    Bacon, Mr Richard

    Baker, Norman

    Baker, Steve

    Baldry, Sir Tony

    Baldwin, Harriett

    Barclay, Stephen

    Barker, rh Gregory

    Barwell, Gavin

    Bebb, Guto

    Bellingham, Mr Henry

    Benyon, Richard

    Beresford, Sir Paul

    Berry, Jake

    Bingham, Andrew

    Blackman, Bob

    Blackwood, Nicola

    Boles, Nick

    Bottomley, Sir Peter

    Brady, Mr Graham

    Brake, rh Tom

    Bray, Angie

    Brazier, Mr Julian

    Bridgen, Andrew

    Brokenshire, James

    Brooke, Annette

    Browne, Mr Jeremy

    Bruce, Fiona

    Bruce, rh Sir Malcolm

    Buckland, Mr Robert

    Burley, Mr Aidan

    Burns, Conor

    Burns, rh Mr Simon

    Burrowes, Mr David

    Burstow, rh Paul

    Burt, Alistair

    Burt, Lorely

    Byles, Dan

    Cable, rh Vince

    Cairns, Alun

    Campbell, rh Sir Menzies

    Carmichael, rh Mr Alistair

    Carmichael, Neil

    Carswell, Mr Douglas

    Cash, Mr William

    Chishti, Rehman

    Chope, Mr Christopher

    Clappison, Mr James

    Clark, rh Greg

    Clarke, rh Mr Kenneth

    Clifton-Brown, Geoffrey

    Coffey, Dr Thérèse

    Collins, Damian

    Colvile, Oliver

    Cox, Mr Geoffrey

    Crabb, Stephen

    Crockart, Mike

    Crouch, Tracey

    Davey, rh Mr Edward

    Davies, David T. C. (Monmouth)

    Davies, Glyn

    Davies, Philip

    Davis, rh Mr David

    Dinenage, Caroline

    Djanogly, Mr Jonathan

    Dorrell, rh Mr Stephen

    Doyle-Price, Jackie

    Drax, Richard

    Duncan, rh Mr Alan

    Duncan Smith, rh Mr Iain

    Dunne, Mr Philip

    Ellis, Michael

    Ellison, Jane

    Ellwood, Mr Tobias

    Eustice, George

    Evans, Graham

    Evans, Jonathan

    Evennett, Mr David

    Fabricant, Michael

    Fallon, rh Michael

    Farron, Tim

    Field, Mark

    Foster, rh Mr Don

    Fox, rh Dr Liam

    Freer, Mike

    Fuller, Richard

    Gale, Sir Roger

    Garnier, Sir Edward

    Garnier, Mark

    Gauke, Mr David

    George, Andrew

    Gibb, Mr Nick

    Gillan, rh Mrs Cheryl

    Glen, John

    Goodwill, Mr Robert

    Gove, rh Michael

    Graham, Richard

    Grant, Mrs Helen

    Gray, Mr James

    Green, rh Damian

    Grieve, rh Mr Dominic

    Griffiths, Andrew

    Gummer, Ben

    Gyimah, Mr Sam

    Halfon, Robert

    Hames, Duncan

    Hammond, rh Mr Philip

    Hammond, Stephen

    Hancock, Mr Mike

    Hands, Greg

    Harris, Rebecca

    Hart, Simon

    Harvey, Sir Nick

    Haselhurst, rh Sir Alan

    Heald, Oliver

    Heath, Mr David

    Heaton-Harris, Chris

    Hemming, John

    Henderson, Gordon

    Hendry, Charles

    Herbert, rh Nick

    Hinds, Damian

    Hoban, Mr Mark

    Hollingbery, George

    Hollobone, Mr Philip

    Holloway, Mr Adam

    Hopkins, Kris

    Horwood, Martin

    Howarth, Sir Gerald

    Howell, John

    Hughes, rh Simon

    Hunt, rh Mr Jeremy

    Huppert, Dr Julian

    Jackson, Mr Stewart

    Jenkin, Mr Bernard

    Johnson, Joseph

    Jones, Andrew

    Jones, rh Mr David

    Jones, Mr Marcus

    Kawczynski, Daniel

    Kelly, Chris

    Kennedy, rh Mr Charles

    Kirby, Simon

    Knight, rh Mr Greg

    Kwarteng, Kwasi

    Laing, Mrs Eleanor

    Lamb, Norman

    Lancaster, Mark

    Lansley, rh Mr Andrew

    Latham, Pauline

    Leadsom, Andrea

    Lee, Jessica

    Lee, Dr Phillip

    Leech, Mr John

    Lefroy, Jeremy

    Leigh, Sir Edward

    Leslie, Charlotte

    Lewis, Brandon

    Lewis, Dr Julian

    Liddell-Grainger, Mr Ian

    Lilley, rh Mr Peter

    Lord, Jonathan

    Loughton, Tim

    Luff, Peter

    Lumley, Karen

    Macleod, Mary

    Main, Mrs Anne

    May, rh Mrs Theresa

    Maynard, Paul

    McCartney, Karl

    McLoughlin, rh Mr Patrick

    McPartland, Stephen

    McVey, Esther

    Menzies, Mark

    Mercer, Patrick

    Metcalfe, Stephen

    Miller, rh Maria

    Mills, Nigel

    Milton, Anne

    Mitchell, rh Mr Andrew

    Moore, rh Michael

    Mordaunt, Penny

    Morgan, Nicky

    Morris, James

    Mosley, Stephen

    Mowat, David

    Mundell, rh David

    Munt, Tessa

    Murray, Sheryll

    Murrison, Dr Andrew

    Neill, Robert

    Newmark, Mr Brooks

    Nokes, Caroline

    Norman, Jesse

    Nuttall, Mr David

    Offord, Dr Matthew

    Ollerenshaw, Eric

    Opperman, Guy

    Paice, rh Sir James

    Parish, Neil

    Patel, Priti

    Paterson, rh Mr Owen

    Pawsey, Mark

    Penrose, John

    Percy, Andrew

    Perry, Claire

    Phillips, Stephen

    Pickles, rh Mr Eric

    Pincher, Christopher

    Pugh, John

    Raab, Mr Dominic

    Randall, rh Mr John

    Reckless, Mark

    Redwood, rh Mr John

    Rees-Mogg, Jacob

    Reevell, Simon

    Reid, Mr Alan

    Rifkind, rh Sir Malcolm

    Robertson, rh Hugh

    Robertson, Mr Laurence

    Rogerson, Dan

    Rosindell, Andrew

    Rudd, Amber

    Ruffley, Mr David

    Russell, Sir Bob

    Rutley, David

    Sanders, Mr Adrian

    Sandys, Laura

    Scott, Mr Lee

    Selous, Andrew

    Shelbrooke, Alec

    Shepherd, Sir Richard

    Simmonds, Mark

    Simpson, Mr Keith

    Skidmore, Chris

    Smith, Miss Chloe

    Smith, Henry

    Smith, Julian

    Smith, Sir Robert

    Soames, rh Nicholas

    Spelman, rh Mrs Caroline

    Spencer, Mr Mark

    Stephenson, Andrew

    Stevenson, John

    Stewart, Bob

    Stewart, Iain

    Stewart, Rory

    Streeter, Mr Gary

    Stride, Mel

    Stuart, Mr Graham

    Stunell, rh Sir Andrew

    Sturdy, Julian

    Swales, Ian

    Swinson, Jo

    Swire, rh Mr Hugo

    Syms, Mr Robert

    Tapsell, rh Sir Peter

    Teather, Sarah

    Thornton, Mike

    Thurso, John

    Tomlinson, Justin

    Tredinnick, David

    Truss, Elizabeth

    Tyrie, Mr Andrew

    Uppal, Paul

    Vaizey, Mr Edward

    Vara, Mr Shailesh

    Vickers, Martin

    Villiers, rh Mrs Theresa

    Walker, Mr Robin

    Wallace, Mr Ben

    Walter, Mr Robert

    Ward, Mr David

    Watkinson, Dame Angela

    Weatherley, Mike

    Wharton, James

    Wheeler, Heather

    White, Chris

    Whittaker, Craig

    Whittingdale, Mr John

    Wiggin, Bill

    Williams, Mr Mark

    Williams, Roger

    Williams, Stephen

    Williamson, Gavin

    Willott, Jenny

    Wilson, Mr Rob

    Wright, Simon

    Yeo, Mr Tim

    Young, rh Sir George

    Zahawi, Nadhim

Gave themselves a pat on the back instead-remember them

 

    Tellers for the Noes:

    Karen Bradley and Mark Hunter

 

 

Jul 072013
 
DPAC Logo with text underneath "Disabled People Against Cuts" and then web address dpac.uk.net

DPAC Paupers Picnic: BRING LOUD VOICES TO CREATE DEMO IN CENTRAL LOBBY AT HOUSE OF COMMON AS MPs ARE IN CIA DEBATE – BRING BREAD & WATER FOR THE PAUPERS PICNIC IN THE CENTRAL LOBBY… https://www.facebook.com/events/143321692538348/

 

Plus Opposition day debate program

Commons main chamber
12pm
[ Minister’s Question Time

Ten Minute Rule Motion
Slavery – Mr Peter Bone]

>>>Debate<<<
Opposition Day (5th allotted day) (Half day) – The effect of Government Policies on Disabled People

https://wowpetition.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/ciadisability-on-big-wednesday-july-10.html

HOC sel cmte
9.30am Education
Subject: Foundation years: Sure Start children’s centres
Witness(es): Louise Silverton, Director for Midwifery, Royal College of Midwives, Cllr Richard Roberts, Lead Member for Children’s Services and member of Health and Wellbeing Board, Hertfordshire County Council , Jane Williams, Head of Children, Young People and Family Services, Integrated and Community Care Division, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust and Carole Bell, Head of Children’s Commissioning, North West London Commissioning Support Unit ; Annie Hudson, Chief Executive Designate of The College of Social Work,, Neil Couling, Work Services Director, Department of Work and Pensions, Tim Sherriff, Head Teacher, Westfield Community School and Children’s Centre, Wigan and Elizabeth Young, Director Research Evaluation & Policy, Home Start UK
Location: The Wilson Room, Portcullis House

9.30am Work and Pensions
Subject: Universal Credit: follow-up
Witness(es): Rt Hon Iain Duncan Smith, Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions, Lord Freud, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Welfare Reform , Howard Shiplee, Universal Credit Director General and Suzanne Newton, Real Time Information Programme Director, HM Revenue and Customs
Location: The Grimond Room, Portcullis House

2.30pm Work and Pensions
Subject: DWP Annual Report and Accounts 2012-13: DWP Statistics
Witness(es): John Shields, Director of Communications and David Frazer, Director of Information, Governance and Security Directorate
Location: Room 5, Palace of Westminster

HOL Sel cmte
10.45am Olympic and Paralympic Legacy Committee
Subject: Olympic and Paralympic Legacy Committee
Witness(es): (at 10.45am) evidence will be heard from Councillor Guy Nicholson, Cabinet Member for Regeneration, Hackney Borough Council and Councillor Chris Robbins, Leader, Waltham Forest Borough Council and at approximately 11.45 evidence will be heard from Patricia Yates, Director of Strategy and Communications, Visit Britain
Location: Committee Room 4A, Palace of Westminster

 Posted by at 21:45