Nov 152012

Dear Committee Members,

 Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is being introduced in April 2013 and Atos Healthcare has been selected by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) as one of the delivery partners in the UK.

 DPAC wishes to lodge a formal complaint that its name has been inappropriately used in the PIP Tender Documents submitted by Atos to the DWP as part of the Claimant Representative Groups with which Atos claims to have a successful record of engagement.

 The tender document specifically states “Before designing our PIP solution, Atos engaged with Claimant Representative Groups to take their views into account”.

The other references to CRGs in which DPAC has been identified by name as being included, deal with the future level of engagement that Atos will have with CRGs in order to take the needs and wishes of disabled people into account. Successful engagement with CRGs was an important criterion in this tender, as the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) made clear in August when it stated that successful PIP assessment bids had “demonstrated strong evidence… of close working with disabled people’s representative groups”.

 DPAC has been shocked to learn that its name (and the names of other CRGs mentioned in the tender which have also protested) has been used to lend credibility to Atos’ claim of future successful engagement with these organisations, on which depends, according to DWP, the successful implementation of assessments responsive to needs of disabled people.  DPAC has staged protests against Atos, in particular during the Paralympics games, and has repeatedly denounced Atos’ treatment of disabled people and the computer based assessments leading to so many wrong outcomes.  DPAC does not wish to be associated with Atos in any way, shape or form, and DPAC’s brand has been compromised by this false association.

 DPAC believes that if one excludes CRGs named in the tender which have never been consulted by Atos, which have never had and never intended to have any engagement with Atos, and which have expressed their dismay at the possibility of engaging with what they see as a flawed process, Atos’s claim in this area is not only weak, but also mendacious. 

 We feel it is essential for these assessments that those employed using taxpayers money to carry them out are not awarded the contracts based on the use of false information and we would like the Public Accounts Committee to investigate these matters further.

 Linda Burnip

Co-founder DPAC on behalf of all DPAC members.



[suffusion-the-author display='description']

  11 Responses to “DPAC Complaint and request for further investigation to the Public Accounts Committee on ATOS PIP tender”

  1. Looks like history is repeating itself…

    “The means test scandal : a scathing exposure

    And what does Labour do when they get in…

    We are finding out what our great grandparents lives were like. Tories/Labour/LibDems….All are the same, all in the same party, working hand in hand, they take it in turns, when in power, bad cop, when out of power, good cop.

  2. copied and sent to my local MP with a request she looks in to the matter on my behalf…..Now that is something we can all do….I am disabled and my mp works on my behalf(try hard not to laugh she’s a tory). enough of them get our emails they have to ask questions.

  3. If some one needs expert view concerning running a blog then
    i propose him/her to pay a visit this website, Keep up the nice job.

  4. It is not my first time to visit this site, i am browsing this web site dailly and take nice data from here everyday.

  5. We need someone to stand up for disabled people, because this government is walking all over them and the working class as well. I don’t hear the opposition calling for anything on this subject, all the working people and disabled people are being trampled on, and nobody is doing anything about and it seems that no one cares or gives a toss anymore.

  6. well we all know atos will lie to get what they want and the dwp will cover for them…if we lie it’s called fraud but if they do it, it’s called a cover up…well it’s time to teach them that it’s not and should not be one rule for them and one rule for the rest of us….time to put them in their place once and for all….regards…sandra.

  7. Thank God for people like you to stand up for disabled peoples rights.we must use our democratic right and vote at the next general election

  8. I couldn’t agree more Linda and I think you will find that all disability activists will support this suggestion.

    Perhaps you may also wish to invite everyone concerned to copy this post to their MPs?

  9. Appalling and unprofessional behaviour by ATOS. Lying to seek and confirm a business contract through deliberate manipulation of rules and regulations warrants a severe response.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>



For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I agree to these terms.